Thrown out of an FBO...

Oh please. There's the R word again. Whenever a legitimate argument cannot be
made, I've noticed that "racism" charges seep out.

Anyone objective person can look at the words of liberals in the USA
and note that they are the true racists (along with many black folks
who spew venom and hatred). Plus liberals enact policies that
promote disfunctional black families that then leads to poverty,
crime, etc. People can improve their lives if they stay in committed
man/woman relationships, only raise kids that they can afford, take on
the responsibility to ensure that the kids are ejumakated and teach
them right from wrong.

Unfortunately, with liberals around that won't happen.

Jay, if you are still reading these how do you like the turn of
events?

Ron Lee

Unfortunately, with liberals around that won't happen.

Jay, if you are still reading these how do you like the turn of
events?

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........mmmm...wha...HUH ? Oh, right. THIS
thread....

:-)

Actually, Ron, although we are far afield from my original post, I DO
find it fascinating and refreshing to note that there are people out
there (like you, and Jessica, etc.) who are still willing to logically,
point-by-point refute the nonsense and hatred spewed by the "liberal"
(GOD, what a horrible *******ization of a once-wonderful word!)
Hotze/Borchardt/Drescher/Regish clan. I, for one, ran out of energy to
argue with their block-headed stubborness long ago.

I've come to the sad conclusion that it is impossible to impart what
most of us see as common sense into people who claim to understand the
logic behind the theory of evolution, yet profess to seeing nothing
wrong -- or even unusual -- about sexual practices that by themselves
would guarantee the end of the human race.

I hold out little hope for changing anyone that can bend their minds
around such illogic.

Which, by the way, isn't to say I have anything against homosexuality.
I personally don't care if you want to screw pumpkins all night, if you
do it in the privacy of your own home and far, far away from my kids.
But don't even THINK about telling anyone that it's "normal", or that
my children need to be exposed to it.

Quite frankly, I don't understand why the homosexual lobby is wasting
all of their political credibility on the same-sex marriage issue. If
they had any sense at all, they would spend their political capital on
obtaining equal rights for same-sex unions -- call them whatever you
want, except "marriage" -- and drop the politically suicidal tactic of
trying to claim that their relationships are "normal" and should be
called "marriage". No mainstream national politician can support such
a stance, and -- one state a time -- homosexuals are going to find that
their current rights have been stripped away, either through referendum
or by amendment. It's already happening.

Quite frankly, I don't think that most people care if two guys want to
claim ever-lasting love, nor would they care if they were granted all
of the rights that married couples have by law. What they DO care about
is the specious claims that these couples are somehow "married" or
"normal". It's an insult to our intelligence, and the homosexual
lobby is doing far more self-harm than good by pressing this issue to
the breaking point.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

in article , Jay Honeck
at wrote on 11/13/06 6:36 PM:



Which, by the way, isn't to say I have anything against homosexuality.
I personally don't care if you want to screw pumpkins all night, if you
do it in the privacy of your own home and far, far away from my kids.
But don't even THINK about telling anyone that it's "normal", or that
my children need to be exposed to it.

How amusing to read these thoughts in a forum devoted to FLYING. God forbid
people should devote themselves to any pursuit not strictly sanctioned by
nature, eh?

I hate to break it to some folks, but human endeavor in its ENTIRETY has
been about defying nature at every turn. It's the only reason we live the
way we do.

And don't worry about the population, Jay. Even if 90% of us permanently
stopped breeding, there would still be plenty of people.

"Philip S." wrote in message
...
in article , Jay
Honeck
at wrote on 11/13/06 6:36 PM:
How amusing to read these thoughts in a forum devoted to FLYING. God
forbid
people should devote themselves to any pursuit not strictly sanctioned by
nature, eh?

I hate to break it to some folks, but human endeavor in its ENTIRETY has
been about defying nature at every turn. It's the only reason we live the
way we do.

True to a point, however, using an 'exit' as an 'entrance' is not sinply
(note intentional mis-spelling) defying nature. It's defying God (pick
one!), nature, and the way of our ancestors. This country, and I'm sure
yours, didn't get where it is today by spinning around our fellow man and
giving him a good old rogering!
But we digress.
Jay! I think the guy that threw you out was went overboard, even if he was
offended by the comments, which to me, should have been taken in the
joking/ribbing way intended. If he was a blonde woman, would he have reacted
as badly to a blonde joke? Most blonde women I know certainly would have
just laughed along with it!
Oz/Crash Lander



And don't worry about the population, Jay. Even if 90% of us permanently
stopped breeding, there would still be plenty of people.

in article , Crash Lander at
wrote on 11/13/06 7:53 PM:

"Philip S." wrote in message
...
in article , Jay
Honeck
at wrote on 11/13/06 6:36 PM:
How amusing to read these thoughts in a forum devoted to FLYING. God
forbid
people should devote themselves to any pursuit not strictly sanctioned by
nature, eh?

I hate to break it to some folks, but human endeavor in its ENTIRETY has
been about defying nature at every turn. It's the only reason we live the
way we do.

True to a point, however, using an 'exit' as an 'entrance' is not sinply
(note intentional mis-spelling) defying nature. It's defying God (pick
one!), nature, and the way of our ancestors. This country, and I'm sure
yours, didn't get where it is today by spinning around our fellow man and
giving him a good old rogering!

To which ancestors are you referring? The Greeks, perhaps?

And as to what "God" dictates, at least one fairly influential Holy Book
declares three-score-and-ten to be the "normal" human life span (that's "70"
to you). I fully intend to live beyond that landmark, and I don't give a
**** what God has to say about it. So there.

"Philip S." wrote in message
...
in article , Crash Lander
at
wrote on 11/13/06 7:53 PM:
To which ancestors are you referring? The Greeks, perhaps?

And as to what "God" dictates, at least one fairly influential Holy Book
declares three-score-and-ten to be the "normal" human life span (that's
"70"
to you).

No **** Sherlock. You forget. _I'm_ the one who can tell an entrance from an
exit!

I fully intend to live beyond that landmark, and I don't give a
**** what God has to say about it. So there.

You sure you don't want to add a 'ner ni ner ni ner nah' to the end of that
post? Poke your tongue out at me perhaps?

Good luck to you. Just be careful what and who you're doing when you're
doing all that rogering, or you won't get anywhere near 70. I may be wrong,
but I'd seriously doubt the percentage of homosexuals over 70 is anywhere
near the percentage of homosexuals under 50.

Now, perhaps you can help me with an anatomy question that's been bugging me
for years! Where exactly are the vocal chords located? At school, I was
taught they were in the throat, however, listening to the way homosexual men
speak, I'd swear they must be located elsewhere! All jokes and debates aside
though, why is it that homosexual men (stereotypically or not) speak in the
manner they do? You know what I mean?

Look, I don't really care what you do in your bedroom, and whether I agree
with that way of life or not is of no consequence to anything, but what
really annoys me is that the homosexual community feels the need to parade
their activities in public by way of Gay Madi Gras and the like. How
ridiculous would it be to have a 'Heterosexual Madi Gras'. TV shows like
"The Amazing Race" and "Survivor" etc, all have to have the 'token gay'
person. Why? Were they more eligible or qualified to be on the show than
anyone who wasn't gay? Probably not. Why not a 'token person with
depression'? I'd suggest the percentage of people with depression in the
world would be larger than the percentage of gay people in the world.

Why do homosexual men feel compelled to 'do' each other in public toilets
along popular walking tracks? It's just not 'normal' behaviour! Apart from
being against the law! (for gay OR straight people!).
Anyway. too much bandwidth for this never ending debate. You'll continue to
live your way, and I'll continue to live my way. I'll just do my best to
keep your way and my way separate.
At least we can still share our love of flying though. Proof that there is a
God. Believe it or not.
Oz/Crash Lander

in article , Crash Lander at
wrote on 11/13/06 8:46 PM:

"Philip S." wrote in message
...
in article , Crash Lander
at
wrote on 11/13/06 7:53 PM:
To which ancestors are you referring? The Greeks, perhaps?

And as to what "God" dictates, at least one fairly influential Holy Book
declares three-score-and-ten to be the "normal" human life span (that's
"70"
to you).

No **** Sherlock. You forget. _I'm_ the one who can tell an entrance from an
exit!

I fully intend to live beyond that landmark, and I don't give a
**** what God has to say about it. So there.

You sure you don't want to add a 'ner ni ner ni ner nah' to the end of that
post? Poke your tongue out at me perhaps?

Lot's of gay obsession snipped

Why do you conclude that I'm a homosexual? Just curious.

"Crash Lander" wrote in message
...
True to a point, however, using an 'exit' as an 'entrance' is not sinply
(note intentional mis-spelling) defying nature. It's defying God (pick
one!), nature, and the way of our ancestors.

You're simply projecting your personal squeamishness onto nature and God.
(How can anyone seriously believe that a Creator of the Universe would run
around fretting about where homo sapiens rub their genitals?)

Yes, our ancestors made the same mistake you're making, but that's no reason
to perpetuate it. Women's suffrage, when first introduced, was likewise a
defiance of what our ancestors had believed for thousands of years. And like
you, the opponents of that step forward felt certain that the change was
contrary to nature and God.

Which is the exact kind of thinking that makes religion, all religion, a
truly dangerous thing.

mike


"Crash Lander" wrote in message
...

It's defying God (pick
one!), nature, and the way of our ancestors.

"mike regish" wrote in message
. ..
Which is the exact kind of thinking that makes religion, all religion, a
truly dangerous thing.

mike
Like it or not, religion runs the world. How many wars were NOT religion
based?
Homosexual people cry discrimination all the time. I can't understand this.
We have bars, and clubs where you go and have a drink with friends. Gay
people feel the need to have 'gay bars, and gay clubs'. What's wrong with
the bars and clubs that are already there, and what has a bar or club got to
do with your sexual preference?
If I'm in a bar having a beer, I'll still drink with you. I don't expect
your sexual preference to be a required part of the conversation!
Oz/Crash Lander