Thrown out of an FBO...

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:58:31 +0000, Judah wrote:
IMHO, the President of the most powerful country in the world shouldn't
do things half-assed. It weakens the country.

Yeah, but if we had done it *right* (i.e. just nuked the whole ****in'
Mid-East), ya'll would be bitchin' about *that* too...

"Grumman-581" wrote in message
newsan.2006.11.13.05.23.29.779331@DIE-\

Yeah, but if we had done it *right* (i.e. just nuked the whole ****in'
Mid-East),

For what?


-c

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:29:11 -0800, gatt wrote:
For what?

For allowing the rise of the Islamofascism... If they can't take care of
their own house, we wipe them off the face of the planet... They brought
the war to us, it's our duty to ensure that this can never happen again...
As long as any of them are left alive, there is a chance that it will
though... Of course, the eco-freaks will say that by killing all of them,
we would mess up the ecological balance over there... Yeah, they're
probably right since that wouldn't leave anyone alive to **** the
camels... Bummer...

"Grumman-581" wrote in message
newsan.2006.11.13.23.29.40.944531@DIE-


On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:29:11 -0800, gatt wrote:
For what?

For allowing the rise of the Islamofascism... If they can't take care of
their own house, we wipe them off the face of the planet...

And they might use the same logic against America for allowing the rise of
Whateverism. How about Christofascism? We better start wiping these
fundies out before somebody suitcase-nukes our cities and tries to wipe us
off the planet.

They brought the war to us,

Iraq brought the war to us? Yemen brought the war to us? Egypt? Kuwait?
How many of "them" do you suggest we "wipe off the face of the planet"?

Of course, the eco-freaks will say that by killing all of them, we would
mess up the ecological balance over there..

The "eco-freaks" have never said anything remotely close to that.

. Yeah, they're probably right since that wouldn't leave anyone alive to
**** the camels... Bummer...

I'm not sure YOU have any idea what sex with camels has to do with
ecological balance.

Sorry. Welcome to my killfile. I don't have patience for this sort of
knee-jerk redneck ignorance and you're not demonstrating the intellectual
maturity that would make me trust anything you said with regard to aviation.

*plonk*

-c

Bingo. You got it! They *are* using the same logic against the western
world. We are infidels, and there are only two options: conversion or
death. Which one do you want?

For allowing the rise of the Islamofascism... If they can't take care of
their own house, we wipe them off the face of the planet...

And they might use the same logic against America for allowing the rise of
Whateverism. How about Christofascism? We better start wiping these
fundies out before somebody suitcase-nukes our cities and tries to wipe us
off the planet.

"LWG" wrote in message
. ..

And they might use the same logic against America for allowing the rise
of Whateverism. How about Christofascism? We better start wiping these
fundies out before somebody suitcase-nukes our cities and tries to wipe
us off the planet.

Bingo. You got it! They *are* using the same logic against the western
world. We are infidels, and there are only two options: conversion or
death. Which one do you want?

If we apply that logic to Islam, do we also apply it to Christianity when we
are told that the punishment for not believing is ETERNAL torture and
damnation?

Is there some reason I would wish to kill a child in Jordan or Kuwait
because of a fundamentalist in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan?

There are radical muslims in Australia. Should we nuke Sydney, too?


-c

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:34:12 -0800, gatt wrote:
Sorry. Welcome to my killfile. I don't have patience for this sort of
knee-jerk redneck ignorance and you're not demonstrating the intellectual
maturity that would make me trust anything you said with regard to aviation.

Awh, gee...That just breaks my ****in' heart... Sorry if I don't subscribe
to the PC bull**** of us needing to *understand* the camel ****in' Bedoins
so that we know *why* they want to kill us... I'm satisfied that they do
want to kill us and it is our job to kill them before they kill us... Any
'innocent' camel ****in' Bedoins that we happen to kill in the process is
just acceptable collateral damages...

Gatt,

For what?


You're actually trying sensible discussion with this nutcase?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Gatt,

For what?

You're actually trying sensible discussion with this nutcase?

Nope. It ceased to be constructive.

-c