A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Setting altimeters with no radio



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th 06, 04:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Travis Marlatte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 233
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

"Stefan" wrote in message
. ..
Travis Marlatte schrieb:
VFR, it doesn't really matter, does it?


I've always thought that airspace boundaries are to be respected by VFR
traffic, too.

Stefan


I agree that there are many reasons why I need to know my pressure
compensated altitude to avoid busting airspace or illegally flying to close
to person or property.

The discussion was about the life-saving necessity of an accurate altitude
instrument. MX was claiming that GPS is inaccurate enough to kill you. I
presume that that can only happen in one of two ways 1) I fly into the
ground believing my inaccurate intrument or 2) I fly at an altitude
different than the regulated VFR cruise altitudes and run into another
plane.

I think both are highly unlikely in VFR conditions no matter how inaccurate
the instrument.


-------------------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK


  #2  
Old November 14th 06, 05:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

Travis Marlatte schrieb:

The discussion was about the life-saving necessity of an accurate altitude
instrument.


Sorry to nitpick, but the discussion was about how to set the altimeter
if you can't get the lastest pressure data with the radio. Some guy
proposed to use the GPS altitude as reference, and then some (other?)
guy stated that you better always fly on GPS altitudes, because it's
more accurate anyway. This was the point when I jumped in and said no,
don't do this.

Only then:

MX was claiming that GPS is inaccurate enough to kill you.


Actually, it can. It's accurate within a few meters (depending on how
"enhanced" it is), but only in some 95% or so of the time and in some
90% or so places (the correct numbers don't matter). Which means that if
you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, believing in the
GPS can actually kill you, at least theoretically. Of course I'm rather
looking out of the window when I fly in VMC, so this isn't an issue in
real life for me.

Stefan
  #3  
Old November 14th 06, 07:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 295
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

Stefan wrote:

Actually, it can. It's accurate within a few meters (depending on how
"enhanced" it is), but only in some 95% or so of the time and in some
90% or so places (the correct numbers don't matter). Which means that if
you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, believing in the
GPS can actually kill you, at least theoretically.


Stefan


Actually the 95% number often associated with an accuracy is a
confidence. It is not an availability value. Thus under the
identical conditions 95 times out of a hundred you would be at that
accuracy or better. No value of the other 5% is given and may not be
very much worse. At least in this case not enough to be
life-threatening. Of course if VFR use your eyes and look outside.

Ron Lee
  #4  
Old November 14th 06, 07:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.

  #5  
Old November 15th 06, 08:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Jim Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 437
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

Doug wrote:

No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.


Or how many times your ears popped (:


  #6  
Old November 14th 06, 08:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

Notice how IFR training doesn't include procedures if your altimeter
fails. Reason?

Jim Stewart wrote:
Doug wrote:

No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.


Or how many times your ears popped (:


  #7  
Old November 15th 06, 03:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Setting altimeters with no radio



Doug wrote:
No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.


Because you can't do it in the air, unless you stop the engine first.
  #8  
Old November 15th 06, 04:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.
Because you can't do it in the air, unless you stop the engine first.


Well, you can, sort of, but it probably won't help much. At full
throttle, the manifold pressure will max out at a value that has the
same relationship to altitude as an altimeter. I vaguely recall it's
something like an inch loss per thousand feet high.

Jose
--
"Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where
it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter).
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #9  
Old November 15th 06, 05:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Setting altimeters with no radio

On a normally aspirated engine, the MAP will be about 1 inch
per thousand feet from 29.92 plus about 1.5 inches for
induction losses on a running engine. So if the maximum
observed MAP is 23 inches, you are at about 5,500 feet
pressure altitude [give or take a thousand feet.
Turbocharged engines make such a check impractical.



"Jose" wrote in message
news | No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage
as an altimeter.
| Because you can't do it in the air, unless you stop the
engine first.
|
| Well, you can, sort of, but it probably won't help much.
At full
| throttle, the manifold pressure will max out at a value
that has the
| same relationship to altitude as an altimeter. I vaguely
recall it's
| something like an inch loss per thousand feet high.
|
| Jose
| --
| "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you
can't see where
| it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry
Potter).
| for Email, make the obvious change in the address.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
I Hate Radios Ron Wanttaja Home Built 9 June 6th 05 05:39 PM
(sorta OT) Free Ham Radio Course RST Engineering Piloting 43 January 24th 05 08:05 PM
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 March 25th 04 10:57 PM
Ham Radio In The Airplane Cy Galley Owning 23 July 8th 03 03:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.