![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stefan" wrote in message
. .. Travis Marlatte schrieb: VFR, it doesn't really matter, does it? I've always thought that airspace boundaries are to be respected by VFR traffic, too. Stefan I agree that there are many reasons why I need to know my pressure compensated altitude to avoid busting airspace or illegally flying to close to person or property. The discussion was about the life-saving necessity of an accurate altitude instrument. MX was claiming that GPS is inaccurate enough to kill you. I presume that that can only happen in one of two ways 1) I fly into the ground believing my inaccurate intrument or 2) I fly at an altitude different than the regulated VFR cruise altitudes and run into another plane. I think both are highly unlikely in VFR conditions no matter how inaccurate the instrument. ------------------------------- Travis Lake N3094P PWK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Travis Marlatte schrieb:
The discussion was about the life-saving necessity of an accurate altitude instrument. Sorry to nitpick, but the discussion was about how to set the altimeter if you can't get the lastest pressure data with the radio. Some guy proposed to use the GPS altitude as reference, and then some (other?) guy stated that you better always fly on GPS altitudes, because it's more accurate anyway. This was the point when I jumped in and said no, don't do this. Only then: MX was claiming that GPS is inaccurate enough to kill you. Actually, it can. It's accurate within a few meters (depending on how "enhanced" it is), but only in some 95% or so of the time and in some 90% or so places (the correct numbers don't matter). Which means that if you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, believing in the GPS can actually kill you, at least theoretically. Of course I'm rather looking out of the window when I fly in VMC, so this isn't an issue in real life for me. Stefan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Actually, it can. It's accurate within a few meters (depending on how "enhanced" it is), but only in some 95% or so of the time and in some 90% or so places (the correct numbers don't matter). Which means that if you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, believing in the GPS can actually kill you, at least theoretically. Stefan Actually the 95% number often associated with an accuracy is a confidence. It is not an availability value. Thus under the identical conditions 95 times out of a hundred you would be at that accuracy or better. No value of the other 5% is given and may not be very much worse. At least in this case not enough to be life-threatening. Of course if VFR use your eyes and look outside. Ron Lee |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug wrote:
No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter. Or how many times your ears popped (: |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Notice how IFR training doesn't include procedures if your altimeter
fails. Reason? Jim Stewart wrote: Doug wrote: No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter. Or how many times your ears popped (: |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Doug wrote: No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter. Because you can't do it in the air, unless you stop the engine first. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No one has mentioned using the manifold pressure guage as an altimeter.
Because you can't do it in the air, unless you stop the engine first. Well, you can, sort of, but it probably won't help much. At full throttle, the manifold pressure will max out at a value that has the same relationship to altitude as an altimeter. I vaguely recall it's something like an inch loss per thousand feet high. Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On a normally aspirated engine, the MAP will be about 1 inch
per thousand feet from 29.92 plus about 1.5 inches for induction losses on a running engine. So if the maximum observed MAP is 23 inches, you are at about 5,500 feet pressure altitude [give or take a thousand feet. Turbocharged engines make such a check impractical. "Jose" wrote in message news ![]() as an altimeter. | Because you can't do it in the air, unless you stop the engine first. | | Well, you can, sort of, but it probably won't help much. At full | throttle, the manifold pressure will max out at a value that has the | same relationship to altitude as an altimeter. I vaguely recall it's | something like an inch loss per thousand feet high. | | Jose | -- | "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where | it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). | for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
(sorta OT) Free Ham Radio Course | RST Engineering | Piloting | 43 | January 24th 05 08:05 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |