Thrown out of an FBO...

They're both athiesm. The first is the type of athiest I was when I saw
religion as mostly harmless stupidity.

I don't see it that way any more, so now I'm an active athiest. I no longer
refuse to talk about religion when it is brought up. I state my athiesm and
my reasons.

mike


"Grumman-581" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:03:03 +0000, Jose wrote:
Athism: I do believe that there is no God.
Nontheism: I do not believe that there is a God.
Agnosticism: I'm not sure if any of the Gods that are proffered
up in the religions I know of, exist.

OK, so which one is, "I don't care whether any dieties exist, I'm just
trying to get through today without having to kill someone" ???

--
"Is it possible for the voices in my head to use email from now on?"

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:29:28 -0500, mike regish wrote:
I don't see it that way any more, so now I'm an active athiest. I no
longer refuse to talk about religion when it is brought up. I state my
athiesm and my reasons.

I'm a live and let live type of person for the most part -- as long as
someone doesn't try to force their lifestyle choices / beliefs upon me...
Otherwise, oh well, gators gotta eat too, ya' know... evil-grin

http://grumman581.googlepages.com/gators-gotta-eat-too

If someone wants to **** sheep while wearing rubber boots and a raincoat
and singing "Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head", I don't care as long as
they do it in private... I don't mind them being a pervert, just keep it
private where it belongs and don't try to pretend that it is a normal
lifestyle choice... If they bring it out in public where my family might
have to see it ... well ... that means that I will have to get involved...
I seriously suspect that neither of us would really like for it to
escalate to that point...

mike regish wrote:

They're both athiesm. The first is the type of athiest I was when I saw
religion as mostly harmless stupidity.

I don't see it that way any more, so now I'm an active athiest. I no longer
refuse to talk about religion when it is brought up. I state my athiesm and
my reasons.

I'm glad to hear that you are willing to debate your religion. That is
the first step to enlightenment.

Matt

I'm already enlightened.

Nothings open to debate in this.

mike

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

I'm glad to hear that you are willing to debate your religion. That is
the first step to enlightenment.

Matt

mike regish wrote:

I'm already enlightened.

Nothings open to debate in this.

If you aren't open to debate, you are operating pretty low on the
intellectual hierarchy.


Matt

Awww...Now I'm hurt.

mike
P.S. Try reality. You'll be truly impressed.

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
mike regish wrote:

I'm already enlightened.

Nothings open to debate in this.

If you aren't open to debate, you are operating pretty low on the
intellectual hierarchy.


Matt

mike regish wrote:
Awww...Now I'm hurt.

mike
P.S. Try reality. You'll be truly impressed.

Chuckle. If you are an example of someone who is trying reality, I
think I'll pass. Time for this thread to die, so I'm bowing out now.
Since folks like you need to have the last word, make your reply to this
and we'll be done.

Cheers,
Matt

They're both athiesm. The first is the type of athiest I was when I saw
religion as mostly harmless stupidity.

I posted three words.

Jose
--
"Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where
it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter).
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.