A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 26th 07, 06:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Erik writes:

There was that one jackass that flew his cessna (I don't know
what model) into the side of the White House. I'm certain he
was violating restricted airspace.

The other question is: If you were to take a 150, load it up with
fuel, misc minor equipment, how much explosive could you get on there?

I guess it would be in the neighborhood of 250 pounds or so, which is
enough to make me nervous.


Then consider this: How much poison gas or biological poison could you load
into a Cessna?

See, if you fill it with explosive, and they shoot you down, you explode
harmlessly in the air. If you fill it with CBW agents, and they shoot you
down, they do your job for you by spreading the agents all over the place. So
whether they shoot you down or not, you accomplish your mission. And you can
be over your target much faster than they can scramble to shoot you down.

There's no way to prevent this, short of preventing aircraft from taking off
in the first place.

However, it's just as easy to do this with a vehicle, and since vehicles
already have practically unrestricted access to all the juicy targets, along
with more capacity and less surveillance, why bother with an aircraft?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old April 26th 07, 07:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
Erik writes:


There was that one jackass that flew his cessna (I don't know
what model) into the side of the White House. I'm certain he
was violating restricted airspace.

The other question is: If you were to take a 150, load it up with
fuel, misc minor equipment, how much explosive could you get on there?

I guess it would be in the neighborhood of 250 pounds or so, which is
enough to make me nervous.


Then consider this: How much poison gas or biological poison could you load
into a Cessna?


See, if you fill it with explosive, and they shoot you down, you explode
harmlessly in the air. If you fill it with CBW agents, and they shoot you
down, they do your job for you by spreading the agents all over the place. So
whether they shoot you down or not, you accomplish your mission. And you can
be over your target much faster than they can scramble to shoot you down.


There's no way to prevent this, short of preventing aircraft from taking off
in the first place.


However, it's just as easy to do this with a vehicle, and since vehicles
already have practically unrestricted access to all the juicy targets, along
with more capacity and less surveillance, why bother with an aircraft?


Dispensing air born chemical or biological weapons takes a fair amount
of sophistication in both the substance and the dispensing mechanism
to cause any significant damage.

Contrary to the breathless scenes in movies and on TV, blowing something
up in midair is a **** poor dispenser of such chemicals.

Take the Tokyo Sarin gas attack on the subway system; 5 coordinated
attacks in an enclosed area with tens ofthousands of people and they
only managed to kill 12, severly injure 50, and irritate about 1000.

A single drop of Sarin can kill an adult, but in spite of having
5 liters of the stuff, not a whole lot of damage was done.

They could have killed and injured far more with a simple bomb.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #3  
Old April 26th 07, 07:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Maxwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,116
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Erik writes:

There was that one jackass that flew his cessna (I don't know
what model) into the side of the White House. I'm certain he
was violating restricted airspace.

The other question is: If you were to take a 150, load it up with
fuel, misc minor equipment, how much explosive could you get on there?

I guess it would be in the neighborhood of 250 pounds or so, which is
enough to make me nervous.


Then consider this: How much poison gas or biological poison could you
load
into a Cessna?

See, if you fill it with explosive, and they shoot you down, you explode
harmlessly in the air. If you fill it with CBW agents, and they shoot you
down, they do your job for you by spreading the agents all over the place.
So
whether they shoot you down or not, you accomplish your mission. And you
can
be over your target much faster than they can scramble to shoot you down.

There's no way to prevent this, short of preventing aircraft from taking
off
in the first place.

However, it's just as easy to do this with a vehicle, and since vehicles
already have practically unrestricted access to all the juicy targets,
along
with more capacity and less surveillance, why bother with an aircraft?



Yeah, just last week Lowe's was giving away 50 lb. bags of anthrax when you
bought a new dusing attachment for any popular Cessan or Piper model.


  #4  
Old April 27th 07, 11:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Erik wrote:

There was that one jackass that flew his cessna (I don't know
what model) into the side of the White House. I'm certain he
was violating restricted airspace.


1. It was a 150.
2. It never got anywhere near the building, it smacked into a tree
(and didn't do much damage to it) on the grounds.
3. He was violating the class B airspace and a prohibited area.

I guess it would be in the neighborhood of 250 pounds or so, which is
enough to make me nervous. It certainly wouldn't be an "Oklahoma
City" bomb, though.


It wouldn't even get as good as loading up a jeep with over 1000 lbs
of stuff and four-wheeling it in close.
  #5  
Old April 27th 07, 10:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message m...
: Erik wrote:
:
: There was that one jackass that flew his cessna (I don't know
: what model) into the side of the White House. I'm certain he
: was violating restricted airspace.
:
: 1. It was a 150.
: 2. It never got anywhere near the building, it smacked into a tree
: (and didn't do much damage to it) on the grounds.
: 3. He was violating the class B airspace and a prohibited area.
:
: I guess it would be in the neighborhood of 250 pounds or so, which is
: enough to make me nervous. It certainly wouldn't be an "Oklahoma
: City" bomb, though.
:
: It wouldn't even get as good as loading up a jeep with over 1000 lbs
: of stuff and four-wheeling it in close.

I remember the pictures. The plane made it to the White House walls:

Startled uniformed Secret Service officers at the White House saw the descending plane at 1:49 a.m. and ducked for
cover. The plane crashed onto the South Lawn of the White House, skidded, slammed through the hedge and clipped the tree
before it hit a wall on the west side of the mansion.



http://www-tech.mit.edu/V114/N40/crash.40w.html


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.