![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: I'm still not clear on the exact procedure for position reports if you are flying VFR over long distances without flight following. To whom do you report your position, and what information should it include? Which positions do you report and how often? To FSS (Fligh****ch) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh... Andrew, you do realize that Flight Watch is a purely weather position
with no other responsibilities, right? Call FSS, yes, call Flight Watch, no. Bob Gardner "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message ups.com... Mxsmanic wrote: I'm still not clear on the exact procedure for position reports if you are flying VFR over long distances without flight following. To whom do you report your position, and what information should it include? Which positions do you report and how often? To FSS (Fligh****ch) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:33:20 -0800, Bob Gardner wrote:
Uh... Andrew, you do realize that Flight Watch is a purely weather position with no other responsibilities, right? Call FSS, yes, call Flight Watch, no. I've often wondered: why the distinction? Isn't Flight Watch the same set of people? - Andrew (a different Andrew) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They all work in the same building and get paid from the same pool of money,
but the last time I visited the Seattle AFSS there was one person at the Flight Watch position whose sole responsibility it was to answer queries about the weather on 122.0...s/he worked no other frequency. And his scope did not have a flight plan screen, as did the other scopes in the room. Bob Gardner "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:33:20 -0800, Bob Gardner wrote: Uh... Andrew, you do realize that Flight Watch is a purely weather position with no other responsibilities, right? Call FSS, yes, call Flight Watch, no. I've often wondered: why the distinction? Isn't Flight Watch the same set of people? - Andrew (a different Andrew) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flight Watch is intended for weather and PIREPS, although in
an emergency, they will talk to you about the impending crash or the other condition. But they are setup as weather specialists. For the real student pilots out there, position reports are often a life saver. In areas of mountains, swamps, oceans and deserts, even your slow trainer can get you many miles away from your last known position in just a few minutes. A flight plan files with a 90 minute ETE will often require a search over several hundred square miles unless you have either made accurate position reports, or received radar service/flight following from ATC. Although VFR position reports are usually given directly to FSS Radio on one of the frequencies publish on the sectional chart or in the AFD, you can give a VFR position report to ATC even if you are not in radar contact, just call Center [call sign] VFR position report. They will be able to record the report and are happy to do so, particularly in remote areas. Learn the format for a position report and don't waste their time stammering. When you start IFR training, you'll be ahead of the class. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... | They all work in the same building and get paid from the same pool of money, | but the last time I visited the Seattle AFSS there was one person at the | Flight Watch position whose sole responsibility it was to answer queries | about the weather on 122.0...s/he worked no other frequency. And his scope | did not have a flight plan screen, as did the other scopes in the room. | | Bob Gardner | | "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message | news ![]() | | Uh... Andrew, you do realize that Flight Watch is a purely weather | position with no other responsibilities, right? Call FSS, yes, call | Flight | Watch, no. | | I've often wondered: why the distinction? Isn't Flight Watch the same set | of people? | | - Andrew (a different Andrew) | | | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" writes:
Although VFR position reports are usually given directly to FSS Radio on one of the frequencies publish on the sectional chart or in the AFD, you can give a VFR position report to ATC even if you are not in radar contact, just call Center [call sign] VFR position report. They will be able to record the report and are happy to do so, particularly in remote areas. This is good to know. I thought only FSS was willing to take position reports, and that you had to request flight following with ATC in order to have them record your position. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... "Jim Macklin" writes: Although VFR position reports are usually given directly to FSS Radio on one of the frequencies publish on the sectional chart or in the AFD, you can give a VFR position report to ATC even if you are not in radar contact, just call Center [call sign] VFR position report. They will be able to record the report and are happy to do so, particularly in remote areas. This is good to know. I thought only FSS was willing to take position reports, and that you had to request flight following with ATC in order to have them record your position. It's "on the tape", that way, and in the event of an overdue aircraft, all records along the flight path are checked for contact with the missing aircraft. The ATC if he has time may even hit the hotline to the local FSS and pass the information. B |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:17:20 -0800, Bob Gardner wrote:
the last time I visited the Seattle AFSS How does one locate a local FSS? I'd like to visit one. -- Dallas |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dallas" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:17:20 -0800, Bob Gardner wrote: the last time I visited the Seattle AFSS How does one locate a local FSS? I'd like to visit one. -- Dallas Start He http://www.afss.com/ Jay B |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:17:20 -0800, Bob Gardner wrote:
They all work in the same building and get paid from the same pool of money, but the last time I visited the Seattle AFSS there was one person at the Flight Watch position whose sole responsibility it was to answer queries about the weather on 122.0...s/he worked no other frequency. And his scope did not have a flight plan screen, as did the other scopes in the room. That's informative to me (ie. I didn't know this {8^), but I still don't know why the separation of the two services? Thanks... - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
GPS and old-fashioned thinking? | G Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 92 | December 22nd 05 05:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |