![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:15:03 +0000, Viperdoc wrote:
it reminds me of my son at the age of four running around with a toy airplane making engine noises. It may be normal for a child Uh oh. I do this w/my four year old. That is, I also run around with a toy airplane making engine noises. That's bad? Of course, he knows what a takeoff and landing look like from "outside". He knows about touch and goes and stop and goes. He knows how an airplane turns (ie. the banking) and why. He knows how to flare with flair. He knows the difference between a tail dragger and a nose dragger. He knows the difference between airplanes with the prop outside the engine and the prop inside the engine (I've spared him a discussion of ramjets {8^). He's been flying with me numerous times. But always going somewhere (even if just to a park at some other airport). Except just a couple of days ago, he said he wanted to join me for some T&Gs. So I opine that an adult running around with a toy airplane making engine noises can be a fine thing indeed. Laugh - Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree completely- the picture I had was of an adult male sitting in front
of a computer "talking" and making position reports with a game, and then getting upset and asking why he couldn't make out a road on the pixelated and smoothed out imagery of MSFS. This image is a little more troubling. I let my now ten year old dial frequency changes on the radios, and let him take the stick and fly for a while as well. (referring now to flying a real airplane, and not MSFS, which he finds boring) He enjoys the participation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:28:31 +0000, Viperdoc wrote:
the picture I had was of an adult That pretty much excludes the OP, if that's to whom you were referring. male sitting in front of a computer "talking" and making position reports with a game, and then getting upset and asking why he couldn't make out a road on the pixelated and smoothed out imagery of MSFS. This image is a little more troubling. Shrug There are a lot of people that seem to be involved in aviation simulation. There's even this "network" of them where some play pilot while others play controller. They actually do talk to one another. Most of them are harmless. Some are going to become pilots; others will remain forever pretenders. But I'm no better than a pretend cook, so who am I to judge? Unfortunately, one likes to post here as if he's an actual pilot. Admittedly, that does seem disconnected from reality. But I'm sure a qualified shrink would find my own disconnects w/o too much trouble, so... I let my now ten year old dial frequency changes on the radios, and let him take the stick and fly for a while as well. (referring now to flying a real airplane, and not MSFS, which he finds boring) He enjoys the participation. Of course! I look forward to years of that "participation" as my own sons age into the front seat (and then their own certificates, not that I'm biased or anything {8^). - Andrew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon writes:
Shrug There are a lot of people that seem to be involved in aviation simulation. There's even this "network" of them where some play pilot while others play controller. They actually do talk to one another. Most of them are harmless. Some are going to become pilots; others will remain forever pretenders. And many of them are already pilots. Simulation is dramatically cheaper and simpler than actual flight, and most pilots can afford to fly only a few hours per month (or year), unless they do it for a living. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Andrew Gideon writes: Shrug There are a lot of people that seem to be involved in aviation simulation. There's even this "network" of them where some play pilot while others play controller. They actually do talk to one another. Most of them are harmless. Some are going to become pilots; others will remain forever pretenders. And many of them are already pilots. Simulation is dramatically cheaper and simpler than actual flight, and most pilots can afford to fly only a few hours per month (or year), unless they do it for a living. You are right there are many real pilots that use sim and that inhabit the flight sim newsgroups. Why don't you head back over there and leave us alone? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
You are right there are many real pilots that use sim and that inhabit the flight sim newsgroups. Why don't you head back over there and leave us alone? Why do you waste so much time on personal attacks if you dislike me? Why not just killfile me and be done with it? I'm refractory to personal attacks, so they will never have any effect on me. I'm puzzled by people who claim to hate me and yet waste hundreds or thousands of posts on tirades against me. What's the _real_ motivation for this? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message news ![]() Gig 601XL Builder writes: You are right there are many real pilots that use sim and that inhabit the flight sim newsgroups. Why don't you head back over there and leave us alone? Why do you waste so much time on personal attacks if you dislike me? Why not just killfile me and be done with it? I'm refractory to personal attacks, so they will never have any effect on me. I'm puzzled by people who claim to hate me and yet waste hundreds or thousands of posts on tirades against me. What's the _real_ motivation for this? I don't hate you. I don't even know you. I can't kill file all the responses to your posts. If you would just stop arguing with everybody that answers your questions I wouldn't have a problem. If you don't like or believe an answer let those that do know something about the subject respond and trust me they will if it is even a little wrong. The way this and any forum like it should work is person A who doesn't have information asks a question and then persons B, who knows the answer, responds. A can then ask a follow-up question if needed. If person B was wrong then C, D and E will chime in and get to the correct answer. But when you ask a question then turn around and argue with damn near everybody that answers you blow the signal to noise ratio all to hell. And don't get me wrong. You have asked some good questions it is the way your respond that ****es me and many others off. Finally, there is a reason that there are thousands of newsgroups. Each newsgroup is for a particular subject and continually remind us that you have no interest in aviation just in flight sims. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
GPS and old-fashioned thinking? | G Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 92 | December 22nd 05 05:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |