![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Tony writes: Instrument Rated pilots don't land on the gauges, they use visual reference. What is Category III c? Not relavant to this newsgroup. And even if it was a pilot isn't landing a Cat 3c airplane, the computer is. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps writes:
Not relavant to this newsgroup. Instrument approaches and landings are not relevant to a piloting newsgroup? Why? And even if it was a pilot isn't landing a Cat 3c airplane, the computer is. Then why does the pilot have to be instrument rated? How many times have you landed in zero visibility? You don't just push a button. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: And even if it was a pilot isn't landing a Cat 3c airplane, the computer is. Then why does the pilot have to be instrument rated? How many times have you landed in zero visibility? You don't just push a button. In Cat IIIC you do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_Landing_System |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many times have you landed in zero visibility? You don't just
push a button. In Cat IIIC you do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_Landing_System He was wrong again. At least that is a consistent thing, for him. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in news:zVE9h.201$Th4.128
@newsfe07.lga: How many times have you landed in zero visibility? You don't just push a button. In Cat IIIC you do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_Landing_System He was wrong again. At least that is a consistent thing, for him. Yeah... He is quite a phenomenon. I have killfiled him, but when he makes a stupid one-liner remark that is easily and factually refuted with a link, I just can't help myself. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Judah" wrote I have killfiled him, but when he makes a stupid one-liner remark that is easily and factually refuted with a link, I just can't help myself. I did, but that was not making his responses go away, so I have changed tactics. I'm going to keep on him, let him dig a deeper hole, and give him more rope. You ought to try it. It's like shooting fish in a barrel, with a 12 gauge shotgun. g -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
I did, but that was not making his responses go away, so I have changed tactics. I'm going to keep on him, let him dig a deeper hole, and give him more rope. You ought to try it. It's like shooting fish in a barrel, with a 12 gauge shotgun. g Why bother? It's so easy to pick out his threads, even with the original question nuked. Just look for the lamest ones. It's probably his. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:23:44 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote: "Judah" wrote I have killfiled him, but when he makes a stupid one-liner remark that is easily and factually refuted with a link, I just can't help myself. I did, but that was not making his responses go away, so I have changed tactics. I'm going to keep on him, let him dig a deeper hole, and give him more rope. You ought to try it. It's like shooting fish in a barrel, with a 12 gauge shotgun. g The problem with that is you keep getting splattered with fish guts. What I should do is write a macro or program to check threads and then kill file the whole thread. It's amazing how the number of posts drops. OTOH I've always had a tendency to answer some out in left field questions with a smart assed remarks and I seriously doubt I'm alone in that. That being the case I'd hate to see some unwary soul led astray. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
In Cat IIIC you do. No, you don't. There's quite a procedure to carry out an autolanding. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_Landing_System Did you by any chance check to see who wrote this article? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Newps writes: Not relavant to this newsgroup. Instrument approaches and landings are not relevant to a piloting newsgroup? Why? Not Cat 3c. And even if it was a pilot isn't landing a Cat 3c airplane, the computer is. Then why does the pilot have to be instrument rated? How many times have you landed in zero visibility? You don't just push a button. Yes, you do. It's required. Cat 3c is an autoland. The pilot is there to monitor the electronics. He does not land the plane. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 96 | February 23rd 06 01:19 AM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |