A reluctance to take the controls

"Morgans" wrote in message
...
TROLL ALERT !!!

I think there is another interloper in our midst. Anyone else notice
that, from the few posts already made?

Your troll-o-meter alarm is set WAY too low.

Before you go accusing someone a troll, you might think about at least
double-checking your impressions with Google first. Your last two
pronouncments (including this one) are easily disproved simply by looking at
what those posters actually post.

"Peter Duniho" wrote

Before you go accusing someone a troll, you might think about at least
double-checking your impressions with Google first.

Probably should.

Your last two pronouncments (including this one) are easily disproved simply
by looking at what those posters actually post.

Last two?

If you are talking about MX, you would have to prove me wrong. You couldn't do
it.

This one, I guess it is guilt by association with and support of troll number 1.
Perhaps it is wrong, so I'll wait and see.
--
Jim in NC

"Morgans" wrote in message
...
[...]
Your last two pronouncments (including this one) are easily disproved
simply by looking at what those posters actually post.

Last two?

If you are talking about MX, you would have to prove me wrong. You
couldn't
do it.

No...Mxsmanic is clearly a troll, in spite of a handful of other people
defending him as otherwise.

I'm referring to your reply to another poster, whose name I've forgotten.
Starts with a "T" I think. If I recall, their post came up in the context
of hangar doors? Or maybe it was just around the same time that thread was
here. I don't recall.

This one, I guess it is guilt by association with and support of troll
number 1. Perhaps it is wrong, so I'll wait and see.

There is no way you could legitimately call the person posting as
"Xmnushal8y" a troll. If you'd look at any of the articles posted
previously, that would be apparent. She goes some time between posts
occasionally, but isn't anything like a troll.

Frankly, we're actually relatively lucky. As disruptive as "Mxsmanic" has
been, he's really the only active troll around here these days. Not all
newsgroups are so lucky, nor has r.a.piloting been so lucky in days past
(recalling people like Mulcahy, Zoom, Eagleson, AcroCFI, etc....we've had
our share of nutcases, and just as they all eventually faded away, so too
will "Mxsmanic")

Pete

"Peter Duniho" wrote

I'm referring to your reply to another poster, whose name I've forgotten.
Starts with a "T" I think. If I recall, their post came up in the context of
hangar doors? Or maybe it was just around the same time that thread was here.
I don't recall.

Oh, I remember. Something like tater shood.

He was a troll, too. He was not nearly as staying and persistant, and is long
gone. He seemed to think you could fly on a minimum wage job, as part of his
central argument. Shoot, you can't even live on a minimum wage job.

There is no way you could legitimately call the person posting as "Xmnushal8y"
a troll. If you'd look at any of the articles posted previously, that would
be apparent. She goes some time between posts occasionally, but isn't
anything like a troll.

OK, but I don't remember the name, without googling. It was her support of MX
that got me.

Frankly, we're actually relatively lucky. As disruptive as "Mxsmanic" has
been, he's really the only active troll around here these days.

If you call MX being here lucky, OK, but he is the most destructive I have seen
around here, ever, IMHO. His argumentative style, and hijacking of threads
reaches into every thread. I, for one, am sick of it, and of all of the people
responding to him as though he is just a lost soul, in need of support and
encouragement.

Dudley had it right, when he said he had not seen one play the group so
skillfully in a long time.

I have spent all of my energy that I want to on him, for a while. Somebody else
will need to take up the fight.
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
I have spent all of my energy that I want to on him, for a while. Somebody
else will need to take up the fight.


No fight is necessary; let him die from neglect. I nuked him and never see his
posts. I've also gone and added a few of his supporters to the blocked senders
list as well. I figure if they're that far off in their assessment of him,
their judgement is obviously suspect. Why would I want to read any of their
crap? I couldn't come up with a reason so WHOOSH.... away goes trouble down the
drain.

Numbnuts will hang around as long as people respond to him. I am fairly certain
that all but the most thickheaded have finally figured him out. It's just a
matter of time before he decides it's more rewarding to post to
soc.muslim.ideology in order to engage some of those warm folks for some of his
exchanges of ideas. I have no doubt they would react even more enthusiastically
than we have to his endearing style of interogation.

Just let him go. He isn't worth the heartburn. And start nuking the folks who
answer him as well. Don't rail against them... just make them disappear from
your computer.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com

"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote

Just let him go. He isn't worth the heartburn. And start nuking the folks
who answer him as well. Don't rail against them... just make them disappear
from your computer.

Thanks for the reality check.

Done.
--
Jim in NC

In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote:

...we've had
our share of nutcases, and just as they all eventually faded away, so too
will "Mxsmanic")

actually, mx is a repeat offender. I killfiled it back in 2002.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

"Bob Noel" wrote

actually, mx is a repeat offender. I killfiled it back in 2002.

No joke? (well- yeah g)

Same screen name?
--
Jim in NC

In article ,
"Morgans" wrote:

actually, mx is a repeat offender. I killfiled it back in 2002.

No joke? (well- yeah g)

Same screen name?

I think so, but I simply killfiled anything with "Mxsmanic" contained
in the author field.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

Peter Duniho wrote:
"Morgans" wrote in message
...
[...]
Your last two pronouncments (including this one) are easily disproved
simply by looking at what those posters actually post.

Last two?

If you are talking about MX, you would have to prove me wrong. You
couldn't
do it.

No...Mxsmanic is clearly a troll, in spite of a handful of other people
defending him as otherwise.

I'm referring to your reply to another poster, whose name I've forgotten.
Starts with a "T" I think. If I recall, their post came up in the context
of hangar doors? Or maybe it was just around the same time that thread was
here. I don't recall.

This one, I guess it is guilt by association with and support of troll
number 1. Perhaps it is wrong, so I'll wait and see.

There is no way you could legitimately call the person posting as
"Xmnushal8y" a troll. If you'd look at any of the articles posted
previously, that would be apparent. She goes some time between posts
occasionally, but isn't anything like a troll.

Frankly, we're actually relatively lucky. As disruptive as "Mxsmanic" has
been, he's really the only active troll around here these days. Not all
newsgroups are so lucky, nor has r.a.piloting been so lucky in days past
(recalling people like Mulcahy, Zoom, Eagleson, AcroCFI, etc....we've had
our share of nutcases, and just as they all eventually faded away, so too
will "Mxsmanic")

Pete


Wow being knowledgable in aircraft flight dynamics as opposed to FAA
idiot aerodynamics gets you called a nut case.

You are a what?