![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message news ![]() PilotWeb.org writes: Do not feel guilty about asking for flight following or any other ATC service. If the controller is unable to provide you with the service because of a high workload, then he will tell you he is "unable flight following at this time." Part of good CRM is taking advantage of EVERY AVAILABLE RESOURCE to reduce risk and contribute to safety. VFR flight following, be it terminal or center radar is just one more resource. Use it. Point taken, but I know that ATC's first priority is to keep IFR flights safe, and in busy airspace I'd not want to take any risk of distracting them from that job. If it's quiet I might ask for flight following, or if I felt that I were in a risky situation myself (lots of traffic nearby). You are contradicting yourself Anthony. First you say you don't want to risk distracting in busy airspace then you turn around that you'd use flight following with lots of traffic nearby. ATC is capable of deciding whether or not they are too busy to provide flight following the pilot need not worry about distracting them with the request or the service. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
You are contradicting yourself Anthony. First you say you don't want to risk distracting in busy airspace then you turn around that you'd use flight following with lots of traffic nearby. It's not a contradiction. At some point my safety (and that of others) makes flight following necessary. ATC might be busy, but not with traffic in my area; in that case I don't necessarily need flight following. Or I might be right in the thick of the heavy traffic that ATC is handling, in which case flight following might be justified. ATC is capable of deciding whether or not they are too busy to provide flight following the pilot need not worry about distracting them with the request or the service. I suppose that's true. I hate to impose. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
It's not a contradiction. At some point my safety (and that of others) makes flight following necessary. That's not true. NTSB accident statistics don't support it. It's a service, providing only add'l assistance in the see-and-avoid department, which is the primary way airplanes don't hit each other. F-- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPORTS CLASS/CLUB CLASS | 5 ugly | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 06 11:14 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |