![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
I can't find any guidelines on the type of fixes or waypoints to be included in the routing description of an IFR flight plan. I presume you can use things like VORs and (?) airports, as well as airways and anything indicated on IFR charts or procedures. But can you also use VPxxx waypoints or other VFR fixes? You can clearly use anything that defines an airway (but not T-airways), and ground-based navaids like VORs and NDBs, unless specifically tagged as "VFR Use Only". You specifically may not use VPxxx waypoints. The reason for asking is that I'm wondering if a VFR flight plan with detailed routing that lists specific waypoints and fixes can be easily converted to IFR without changing the routing, should weather or other factors mandate a switch to IFR for the flight. You can google for a long-ago thread that describes how to file a VFR flight plan that actually goes to ATC. If ATC doesn't have your flight plan, you're starting from scratch when you want to convert from VFR to IFR. Basically you check the "IFR" box on the flight plan form, then in the altitude box you write "VFR045" for 4500 feet (or something like that). Someone will correct me. If you don't check the IFR box, ATC never sees your flight plan, just FSS. Another advantage of this technique is that when you call up the next facility for VFR advisories, they already know who you are and where you are going. When the initial controller "departs" you, it initiates sending a strip to each of the facilities down the line based on your filed airspeed, just like for an IFR flight. There was a lot of discussion about whether it is legal to check the IFR box on the flight plan form if you don't hold an instrument rating. Clearly the answer is yes, it is legal [dons flameproof suit]. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Butler writes:
You can clearly use anything that defines an airway (but not T-airways), and ground-based navaids like VORs and NDBs, unless specifically tagged as "VFR Use Only". You specifically may not use VPxxx waypoints. OK. So I'd probably be better off avoiding VPxxx waypoints to begin with, even for VFR, if there's any chance that I'd want to use that as a base for an IFR flight plan. Too bad ... there's lots of VPxxx waypoints on the VFR charts, whereas the only other ones indicated are on airways, and there are a lot less of those (at least in high traffic areas). Basically you check the "IFR" box on the flight plan form, then in the altitude box you write "VFR045" for 4500 feet (or something like that). Someone will correct me. Hmm ... I didn't know that. Another advantage of this technique is that when you call up the next facility for VFR advisories, they already know who you are and where you are going. When the initial controller "departs" you, it initiates sending a strip to each of the facilities down the line based on your filed airspeed, just like for an IFR flight. Sounds very convenient. Is there someplace on the Web that discusses everything you can validly put in an IFR flight plan (or a VFR flight plan, for that matter)? I can't find any detailed descriptions in the references I've looked at. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Is there someplace on the Web that discusses everything you can validly put in an IFR flight plan (or a VFR flight plan, for that matter)? I can't find any detailed descriptions in the references I've looked at. http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff.../media/aim.pdf |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Butler writes:
http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff.../media/aim.pdf Excellent! Thanks. I had the book, but I didn't know it had detailed information on routing. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Aerial PHotography Flights 'Required' to File Flight Plans | C J Campbell | Piloting | 15 | December 6th 04 02:17 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |