![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Beckman wrote: [snip] So you make the call Dave. You want to feed his addiction? You want to help him get his jollies? Be my guest. I'm sticking firmly with those who think he needs a nice long rest in a rubber room. I agree with all your points Jay. I just sit back and shake my head at the Mx posts and replies but it certainly is getting harder and harder. You see, I think MX is just playing on many pilot's urge to talk about flying. He gets a kick out of asking questions that he "knows" the answer to but are "gray" enough to cause controversy to get the most replies. The more replying posts, the better. The guy gets up in the morning and asks himself "what can I ask this sorry-ass group today to get the most responses??" then heads to his computer. We've all met people who like to chew your ear off with conversation. You know, the guys that you say "bye" to 5 times before you can actually leave because you don't want to be rude and cut them off. MX is just playing on these same folks to generate posts for his own somewhat dimented ego. He only gives a **** about what we post as an answer so long as it will creates more replies. Flames and complaints included. C'mon, do you really think he honeslty thought Barons have ejection seats?? Unfortuantely, the sad fact is that there will always be flying conversation-starved pilots who are willing to feed his hunger. Marco |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marco Leon" wrote in
ups.com: I agree with all your points Jay. I just sit back and shake my head at the Mx posts and replies but it certainly is getting harder and harder. Thus the importance of all of us banding together and NOT replying to his posts. Past couple of days, I have seen a reduction in Mx traffic, so this is a good sign :-) I know it's hard, 'specially when he directly replies to my own response to somebody else, but I am determined not to contribute to his trolling ways. Silent treatment against trolls is the best way to get rid of them. We as a group can do this and get our group back. Anybody new that I see popping in that replies to his post, I will let them know they are dealing with a troll. Hopefully others will give them fair warning too. As far as lurkers go, well they certainly have a keyboard to post their own questions..... They surely don't need Mx to ask their questions. Questions that have been posted by Mx are not the problems..... Allen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberma wrote:
"Marco Leon" wrote in ups.com: I agree with all your points Jay. I just sit back and shake my head at the Mx posts and replies but it certainly is getting harder and harder. Thus the importance of all of us banding together and NOT replying to his posts. Past couple of days, I have seen a reduction in Mx traffic, so this is a good sign :-) I know it's hard, 'specially when he directly replies to my own response to somebody else, but I am determined not to contribute to his trolling ways. Silent treatment against trolls is the best way to get rid of them. We as a group can do this and get our group back. Anybody new that I see popping in that replies to his post, I will let them know they are dealing with a troll. Hopefully others will give them fair warning too. As far as lurkers go, well they certainly have a keyboard to post their own questions..... They surely don't need Mx to ask their questions. Questions that have been posted by Mx are not the problems..... Allen Maybe Mx is a college graduate working on a Ph.D. in psychology and studying behavior on the internet. And, he just happened to like flying (sim or otherwise) and is using this as his research. Just a thought. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ross Richardson" wrote in message ... Maybe Mx is a college graduate working on a Ph.D. in psychology and studying behavior on the internet. And, he just happened to like flying (sim or otherwise) and is using this as his research. Just a thought. Interesting theory but his history when searched on Google by doesn't back it up. Here's his home page if you are interested. http://www.atkielski.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
"Ross Richardson" wrote in message ... Maybe Mx is a college graduate working on a Ph.D. in psychology and studying behavior on the internet. And, he just happened to like flying (sim or otherwise) and is using this as his research. Just a thought. Interesting theory but his history when searched on Google by doesn't back it up. Here's his home page if you are interested. http://www.atkielski.com/ Well, his website is certainly far more interesting than those who put him down. I've hardly ever responded to him, but now I think I'll join those who do answer him. Someone else mentioned that he might be a teenager. If so, then I have to laugh myself silly at the macho types who got their panties all tied up in a wad over his answers. How can anyone waste their lives throwing hatred at a know-it-all teen? Moreover, I just realized something crucial. Mx is in France, where people aren't just rude to foreigners, they're rude to each other. So it's no wonder he posts the way he does. He's a product of his environment. I might be in my fifties, but I can admire a kid with such a strong (albeit weird) personality. And I can see why he'd ruffle the feathers of weaker souls and those with sticks up their pompous you-know-whats. Kev |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kev" wrote in message oups.com... Gig 601XL Builder wrote: "Ross Richardson" wrote in message ... Maybe Mx is a college graduate working on a Ph.D. in psychology and studying behavior on the internet. And, he just happened to like flying (sim or otherwise) and is using this as his research. Just a thought. Interesting theory but his history when searched on Google by doesn't back it up. Here's his home page if you are interested. http://www.atkielski.com/ I might be in my fifties, but I can admire a kid with such a strong (albeit weird) personality. And I can see why he'd ruffle the feathers of weaker souls and those with sticks up their pompous you-know-whats. If you can admire a guy that can barely make a living and that attacks women because of their breastfeeding decisions you have some pretty damn low standards. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
"Kev" wrote in message I might be in my fifties, but I can admire a kid with such a strong (albeit weird) personality. And I can see why he'd ruffle the feathers of weaker souls and those with sticks up their pompous you-know-whats. If you can admire a guy that can barely make a living and that attacks women because of their breastfeeding decisions you have some pretty damn low standards. Someone barely making a living doesn't bother me, since that's a relative thing. Any anti-breastfeeding opinion would bother me if he were older or had kids. Actually, it's hard to find anyone without kids who is enlightened on that topic. Where was that on his website? So are we also now going to have to ask each person on this group what their breastfeeding opinions are? Might as well start a political debate too. Sigh. Kev |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gig 601XL Builder wrote: If you can admire a guy that can barely make a living and that attacks women because of their breastfeeding decisions you have some pretty damn low standards. Not such low standards that I have to resort to half-truths. Did you mean the thread in rec.travel.air in 2001? Where the topic was a woman whose bottled breastmilk was thrown away by an airline before boarding? Where Mxsmanic finally suggested (as did others) that she breastfeed? Where when it was revealed that she wouldn't breastfeed because she was too embarrassed, that Mxsmanic suggested water to keep the baby hydrated since she refused to breastfeed over a 12 hour flight? Where people jumping in the middle of the thread with no clue how it started, got this all mixed up? If that was the "attacks" you meant, then I have no problem with them, since they weren't attacks at all. Kev |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just had a look at his site...
Impressive! Fab pix, tons of info..... Dave )On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:39:32 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: "Ross Richardson" wrote in message ... Maybe Mx is a college graduate working on a Ph.D. in psychology and studying behavior on the internet. And, he just happened to like flying (sim or otherwise) and is using this as his research. Just a thought. Interesting theory but his history when searched on Google by doesn't back it up. Here's his home page if you are interested. http://www.atkielski.com/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Impressive! Fab pix, tons of info.....
Is the info correct? Jose -- "There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows what they are." - (mike). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 98 | December 11th 03 06:58 AM |