A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 1st 06, 07:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Neil Gould writes:

The question becomes which options a buyer might find more attractive,
for example would you prefer 3-axis trim or better avionics and moving
map GPS?


How about a three-axis autopilot with three-axis trim?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old December 1st 06, 08:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 723
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Recently, Mxsmanic posted:

Neil Gould writes:

The question becomes which options a buyer might find more
attractive, for example would you prefer 3-axis trim or better
avionics and moving map GPS?


How about a three-axis autopilot with three-axis trim?

On your salary? You must be joking.

Neil



  #3  
Old December 1st 06, 09:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Neil Gould writes:

On your salary? You must be joking.


How many people here have bought their own Barons on their salaries?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #4  
Old December 1st 06, 10:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
TxSrv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 133
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Mxsmanic wrote:
On your salary? You must be joking.


How many people here have bought their own Barons on their salaries?


If any here, 100% of them. What's the point of such ridiculous
posts anyway? Except to antagonize.

F--
  #5  
Old December 1st 06, 10:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

TxSrv writes:

If any here, 100% of them.


I doubt that. Barons are expensive, and most salaries wouldn't pay
for them. Other sources of income would probably come into play, such
as passive investments, etc.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old December 1st 06, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
TxSrv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 133
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Mxsmanic wrote:
TxSrv writes:

If any here, 100% of them.


I doubt that. Barons are expensive, and most salaries wouldn't pay
for them. Other sources of income would probably come into play, such
as passive investments, etc.


More pointless jibberish. When after-tax income, minus
personal-living needs, exceeds the annual acquisition/maintenance
costs of a Baron, buy one if you want. Or a real nice house.
There's a real world out there, not a simulated one.

F--
  #7  
Old December 1st 06, 10:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Viperdoc[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 243
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

I've killfiled certain French residing trolls- but I assure you that I
purchased my own 1980 Baron. It actually costs around the same as a
comparable Bonanza of the same era. It has a moving map, stormscope, radar,
known ice, and a three axis autopilot.

I can assure you that it is a real one, not a sim, and that I work for a
living and did not inherit the funds. This is just more pointless and
irrational gibberish from the troll in France, who should go back to the sim
newsgroups.

I still don't understand why all of his initial questions are reasonable,
and then he goes off on these unsubstantiated and irrational tangents. He
should get a life and deal with people in person rather than hiding on the
internet.


  #8  
Old December 1st 06, 10:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers



Mxsmanic wrote:

TxSrv writes:


If any here, 100% of them.



I doubt that. Barons are expensive, and most salaries wouldn't pay
for them. Other sources of income would probably come into play, such
as passive investments, etc.



Beyond all belief you say dumber and dumber stuff. A used Baron can be
had for a wide variety of prices. It's easy to find a Baron for less
than $100K, not much more than I paid for my Bonanza.
  #9  
Old December 1st 06, 11:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Newps writes:

A used Baron can be had for a wide variety of prices.


Oh. I forgot that some people buy used.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers RomeoMike Piloting 6 December 2nd 06 01:47 AM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Newps Piloting 0 November 30th 06 07:40 PM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Greg Farris Piloting 0 November 30th 06 07:25 PM
HOW MANY GLIDER PILOTS DOES IT TAKE TO CHANGE A LIGHT BULB Mal Soaring 59 October 4th 05 05:39 AM
The light bulb Greasy Rider Military Aviation 6 March 2nd 04 12:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.