Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Mxsmanic wrote:
But the wind is blowing from the right only half the time.

Another pronouncement from the all-knowing. I can guarantee such
is not the case at my airport, with its 2 intersecting rwys.

F--

TxSrv writes:

Another pronouncement from the all-knowing. I can guarantee such
is not the case at my airport, with its 2 intersecting rwys.

I can guarantee that there are other airports besides yours.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
N2310D writes:

Why?

To force the bicycle's momentum to carry it to the left. The wheel
will then turn on its own to the left to restore the equilibrium, and
so will the bicycle.

Wrong. Guess again -- or use one of those fabulous references you claim
to have.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Newps writes:

One has nothing to do with the other. The rider is solely responsible
for keeping it upright.

It will stay up by itself as long as it has traction and power (or
momentum).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

And we have another Twilight Zone program thanks to.............

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .
Monty Python wrote:
Inspector: Good. Now I'm arrestin' this entire show on three counts:
one, acts of self-conscious behaviour contrary to the 'Not in front of
the children' Act, two, always saying 'It's so and so of the Yard'
every time the fuzz arrives and, three, and this is the cruncher,
offenses against the 'Getting out of sketches without using a proper
punchline' Act, four, namely, simply ending every bleedin' sketch by
just having a policeman come in and... wait a minute.
(Another policeman enters.)
Policeman: Hold it. (puts his hand on Inspector Thompson's
Gazelle's shoulder)
Inspector: It's a fair cop.
(A large hairy hand appears through the door and claps him on the
shoulder.)

And now for something completely different:
A man with a tape recorder up his nose.

A Man With Three Buttocks...

Jay B

In article ,
says...


I stand on the shoulders of giants.


And they are groaning about the extraneous noise level in their ears!


"Power" is unrelated to the gyroscopic stability in the equation. Bicycles
travel a large propoortion of the time without application of power to either
wheel. That you would list power to the rear wheel as one of a set of two
exclusive conditions required for the bicycle to remain upright proves that you
haven't really looked at the question very closely, and neither have any
sources you may be quoting.

GF

Recently, Mxsmanic posted:

Newps writes:

Where did you come up with that statistic?

It's statistically inevitable.

Not on this planet, it isn't.

Neil

Recently, Mxsmanic posted:

TxSrv writes:

Another pronouncement from the all-knowing. I can guarantee such
is not the case at my airport, with its 2 intersecting rwys.

I can guarantee that there are other airports besides yours.

I can guarantee that those other airports are designed with knowledge of
the prevailing winds in the area.

Neil

Neil Gould writes:

I can guarantee that those other airports are designed with knowledge of
the prevailing winds in the area.

I can guarantee that prevailing winds are not in the same direction
for every airport.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Greg Farris writes:

"Power" is unrelated to the gyroscopic stability in the equation. Bicycles
travel a large propoortion of the time without application of power to either
wheel.

Yes, through momentum. But this momentum is eroded by irreversible
effects such as friction with the ground and air. Eventually none is
left, and the bicycle stops.

As long as there is power to the wheel, it will compensate for any
losses, and the bicycle will continue to move. Similarly, as long as
the bicycle has momentum, it will continue to move. In both cases, as
long as the wheels retain their traction with the ground, the bicycle
will not fall.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.