![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tim Taylor wrote: Ray, The answer is probably not because we wear sunglasses while I am guessing the participants in the study did not. Tim Well that begs the question: Is it better to wear sunglasses (knowing that you are reducing the amount of light your eyes are seeing, therefore possibly reducing visual detection range) or no sunglasses and black anti-glare face paint? I know of some old fighter pilots who swore by not wearing sunglasses or colored visors - instead they squinted. Since it was a life or death situation, I have to think they might have been on to something. I just got through a season wearing non-tinted prescription glasses (instead of my usual sunglasses) and find I did not miss the sunglasses much - and found vis under clouds much better (also the PDA is easier to see). Now I may have to stop by the sports store and get some anti-glare paint - and really freak out the twirlybirds at the local glider club - to say nothing of the crowd at a contest! Comments? 66 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I often remove my sunglasses in flight. It does significantly increase my
ability to see details both near and far. One reason is that the eye's pupil works just like the f-stop in a camera lens. The smaller the opening the greater the depth of field. With sunglasses the pupil opens wider and reduces the depth of field. Older pilots like me find that a large depth of field compensates somewhat for presbyopia making PDA's easier to read. Another reason is that few human corneas are perfect. A small pupil opening reduces the area of cornea surface used to form an image on the retina increasing the sharpness of the image. Yet another reason is that any optical surface where light passes from one refractive index to another, like the surface of sunglass lens where the light goes from air to plastic, reduces the light intensity and contrast by about 4% in addition to any tinting. The lens actually has two optical surfaces, one is the front surface and the other the rear surface. There are other effects like internal reflections within the sunglass lens that reduce acuity. I always wear wrap-around sunglasses on the airfield, both to protect my eyes from the sun and to protect them from the high velocity grit kicked up by tow planes. Any time you are in the vicinity of a turning propeller, ballistic eye protection is a must. Bill Daniels "kirk.stant" wrote in message oups.com... Tim Taylor wrote: Ray, The answer is probably not because we wear sunglasses while I am guessing the participants in the study did not. Tim Well that begs the question: Is it better to wear sunglasses (knowing that you are reducing the amount of light your eyes are seeing, therefore possibly reducing visual detection range) or no sunglasses and black anti-glare face paint? I know of some old fighter pilots who swore by not wearing sunglasses or colored visors - instead they squinted. Since it was a life or death situation, I have to think they might have been on to something. I just got through a season wearing non-tinted prescription glasses (instead of my usual sunglasses) and find I did not miss the sunglasses much - and found vis under clouds much better (also the PDA is easier to see). Now I may have to stop by the sports store and get some anti-glare paint - and really freak out the twirlybirds at the local glider club - to say nothing of the crowd at a contest! Comments? 66 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At the risk of setting off the yearly Suntiger-vs.-polarized lens
debate, I'll say this. The extra brightness as compared to grey/reflective sunglasses is one big reason I like the orange lenses. But I think I'll pass on the warpaint. I think it would be a "challenging look" at a regional contest though. Go for it. ![]() Sarah kirk.stant wrote: Tim Taylor wrote: Ray, The answer is probably not because we wear sunglasses while I am guessing the participants in the study did not. Tim Well that begs the question: Is it better to wear sunglasses (knowing that you are reducing the amount of light your eyes are seeing, therefore possibly reducing visual detection range) or no sunglasses and black anti-glare face paint? I know of some old fighter pilots who swore by not wearing sunglasses or colored visors - instead they squinted. Since it was a life or death situation, I have to think they might have been on to something. I just got through a season wearing non-tinted prescription glasses (instead of my usual sunglasses) and find I did not miss the sunglasses much - and found vis under clouds much better (also the PDA is easier to see). Now I may have to stop by the sports store and get some anti-glare paint - and really freak out the twirlybirds at the local glider club - to say nothing of the crowd at a contest! Comments? 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Winter Thermal Cross-Country | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 15 | November 16th 05 07:49 AM |
Winter Vario | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | August 17th 05 08:24 AM |
Learning to glide / soar in winter | Oscar | Soaring | 17 | January 28th 05 04:29 PM |
Tie-down winter hazards | [email protected] | Owning | 6 | January 12th 05 10:23 PM |
Winter Flying | [email protected] | Piloting | 36 | January 3rd 05 03:19 AM |