A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old December 3rd 06, 03:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
RomeoMike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 136
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers



N2310D wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Newps writes:

Think trim, dumbass.

All the trim does is move the yoke for you. The same problem still
exists. You have to push forward more and more, and eventually you
run out of travel.


NOT in an airplane, ignoramus.

Do you deliberately hold yourself out for abuse?


To you and the others that keep responding to Mx: I'm on your side, but
don't you see that he's just pulling your chain, enjoying the act of
aggravating you? IMHO, take a deep breath and let him rant on solo.
  #112  
Old December 3rd 06, 04:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Greg Farris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers



THIS :

Yes, through momentum. But this momentum is eroded by irreversible
effects such as friction with the ground and air. Eventually none is
left, and the bicycle stops.

PLUS THIS:

The cyclist balances it, assisted by the gyroscopic stabilizing effect
of the turning wheel (the heavier it is and the faster it turns, the
better).



EQUALS THIS :

"Yes, I was completely wrong, and everything I wrote was complete bull****,
based on a complete lack of understanding of the facts. . ."

Signed : Mad Max



You stated that power to the rear wheel and "traction" were the two requisite
conditions for stability. You specifically and obstinantly discounted
momentum and ANY effet induced by the cyclist.




The giants' shoulders are abraded, and becoming prurient through this abuse.
How much longer do we have to endure it? When will you send us a benediction
and say you have simply decided to give up on us, because we're all too
stupid to deserve your attention, and you have decided to focus your efforts
on alt.medicine.insanity. . .

  #113  
Old December 3rd 06, 05:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Dave Stadt writes:

As a matter of fact for some landings I do exactly that.


From what altitude?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.


What altitude would you like?


  #115  
Old December 3rd 06, 08:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Greg Farris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

In article ,
says...


Greg Farris writes:

"You see . . ."
No - I'm afraid I don't "see"?


Well, this is an aviation forum, so I'll just leave it at that.



Why don't you just leave . . .

  #116  
Old December 3rd 06, 10:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

N2310D writes:

NOT in an airplane, ignoramus.


An airplane is the specific case in which it won't work.

Do you deliberately hold yourself out for abuse?


No, but I do allow others to dig their own holes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #117  
Old December 3rd 06, 10:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Dave Stadt writes:

What altitude would you like?


Straight and level flight at 10,000 feet to an airfield at 1800 feet
MSL.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #118  
Old December 3rd 06, 10:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

N2310D writes:

With either the throttle or the spoilers when on final approach to
land.


Why do you use these if pushing the yoke forward is sufficient?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #119  
Old December 4th 06, 10:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Al G[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 328
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Newps writes:

Ridiculous assertion.


Try it and see.


You mean perform an actual "real world" experiment?

Why not simulate it?

Al G


  #120  
Old December 4th 06, 11:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default MXX - Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

Al G writes:

You mean perform an actual "real world" experiment?


Yes.

Why not simulate it?


Simulation is of no use if you're not willing to trust the simulation.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers RomeoMike Piloting 6 December 2nd 06 01:47 AM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Newps Piloting 0 November 30th 06 07:40 PM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Greg Farris Piloting 0 November 30th 06 07:25 PM
HOW MANY GLIDER PILOTS DOES IT TAKE TO CHANGE A LIGHT BULB Mal Soaring 59 October 4th 05 05:39 AM
The light bulb Greasy Rider Military Aviation 6 March 2nd 04 12:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.