Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

N2310D wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Newps writes:

Think trim, dumbass.
All the trim does is move the yoke for you. The same problem still
exists. You have to push forward more and more, and eventually you
run out of travel.


NOT in an airplane, ignoramus.

Do you deliberately hold yourself out for abuse?


To you and the others that keep responding to Mx: I'm on your side, but
don't you see that he's just pulling your chain, enjoying the act of
aggravating you? IMHO, take a deep breath and let him rant on solo.

THIS :

Yes, through momentum. But this momentum is eroded by irreversible
effects such as friction with the ground and air. Eventually none is
left, and the bicycle stops.

PLUS THIS:

The cyclist balances it, assisted by the gyroscopic stabilizing effect
of the turning wheel (the heavier it is and the faster it turns, the
better).


EQUALS THIS :

"Yes, I was completely wrong, and everything I wrote was complete bull****,
based on a complete lack of understanding of the facts. . ."

Signed : Mad Max



You stated that power to the rear wheel and "traction" were the two requisite
conditions for stability. You specifically and obstinantly discounted
momentum and ANY effet induced by the cyclist.




The giants' shoulders are abraded, and becoming prurient through this abuse.
How much longer do we have to endure it? When will you send us a benediction
and say you have simply decided to give up on us, because we're all too
stupid to deserve your attention, and you have decided to focus your efforts
on alt.medicine.insanity. . .

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Dave Stadt writes:

As a matter of fact for some landings I do exactly that.

From what altitude?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

What altitude would you like?

In article ,
says...


No. If the bicycle cannot turn, it will fall over. It cannot turn on
rollers. It can turn on flat pavement.

You see, the bicycle stays up because it turns.


"You see . . ."
No - I'm afraid I don't "see"?
Ten minuites ago, the bicycle satyed upright due to "power" to the rear wheel,
and "traction" on both wheels. Now, the bicycle stays upright because it
"turns". . .

In your most recent posts, the bicycle "cannot" fall unless it stops or loses
"traction". Now, the bicycle "stays upright because it turns" . . .

THIS GUY IS INSANITY IN DISTILLED FORM - 110 PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!

In article ,
says...


Greg Farris writes:

"You see . . ."
No - I'm afraid I don't "see"?

Well, this is an aviation forum, so I'll just leave it at that.



Why don't you just leave . . .

N2310D writes:

NOT in an airplane, ignoramus.

An airplane is the specific case in which it won't work.

Do you deliberately hold yourself out for abuse?

No, but I do allow others to dig their own holes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Dave Stadt writes:

What altitude would you like?

Straight and level flight at 10,000 feet to an airfield at 1800 feet
MSL.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

N2310D writes:

With either the throttle or the spoilers when on final approach to
land.

Why do you use these if pushing the yoke forward is sufficient?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Newps writes:

Ridiculous assertion.

Try it and see.


You mean perform an actual "real world" experiment?

Why not simulate it?

Al G

Al G writes:

You mean perform an actual "real world" experiment?

Yes.

Why not simulate it?

Simulation is of no use if you're not willing to trust the simulation.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.