![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He asked why this didn't benefit
east to west plane travel timewise and hurt west to east. The short answer is that although one =is= moving faster going eastwards (due to the addition of the spin of the earth), your destination is also scurrying away from you at the same speed. It cancels out. There are teeny effects (having to do with orbital mechanics) but those are not the ones that are important in understsanding the question. The flaw in your friend's reasoning (the reason for his question) has to do with using different frames of reference for different parts of the question - i.e. the earth is =not= spinning with respect to its surface (the ground "stays put" with respect to itself!) but it =is= spinning with respect to its center. We navigate with respect to the earth's surface, not the earth's center. We fly with respect to the wind, which moves over the earth's surface, which is what leads to the illusion of flying sideways (crabbing into the wind). In this respect, one's destination really =is= slipping away below you! The "dropping something from a moving vehicle" does work quite well as an analogy. Acceleration (from the airplane engine) has little to do with it. The key is that although the frame of reference (the earth's surface, or the vehicle) is moving, it is not moving with respect to itself, since by definition, it =is= the frame of reference. Now, this introduces some additional issues, which are the ones normally referred to as the coriolis effect. Since the earth is roughly spheerical and rotating, different parts of the earth are moving (w.r.t. its center) at a different speed. The poles are hardly moving, and the equator is moving fast (which is why, all things equal, you'd be lighter at the equator). If you fire a cannon from the North Pole (in the only direction possible - South), the cannonball will not be in contact with the earth's surface, and as it travels towards the equator, the earth will be spinning out from under it. Now while the muzzle of the cannon may have been moving (one revolution per day, maybe fifty feet per day, as the cannon is attached to the earth's surface), this is next to nothing compared to the speed the equator is moving. The Sahara desert and the Amazon River will both be scooting out from under this cannonball at a thousand miles per hour. You, riding on the cannonball, will get a good sense of the earth spinning under you. However, anybody looking up at the cannonball from the ground will see the same thing in reverse - the cannonball will be slipping the other way through the air - east to west, just like the sun and moon rise. The closer to the equator, the bigger the effect, and that is what gives rise to the large scale air circulations in the earth. Jose -- "There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows what they are." - (mike). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Cable break recovery spin entry... as previously discussed | [email protected] | Soaring | 26 | July 3rd 05 08:28 AM |
How Low to Spin?? | Paul M. Cordell | Soaring | 180 | September 14th 04 07:17 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
Accelerated spin questions | John Harper | Aerobatics | 7 | August 15th 03 07:08 PM |