![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The instrument approach provides terrain clearance along and
to a limited area either side of the final and missed approach path charted. A climb along the approach path is safe, but if you begin a turn prior to the charted location, you run the risk of hitting an obstruction. Consider a fictional IAP with a missed approach that calls for a right turn and going direct to a fix. If it is an ILS, the miss will start at 200 feet or lower from over the runway. But if you miss on the three mile final and start the turn (and climb) early, you would be about 700 at the start, but could also be abeam a TV tower. Perhaps most missed approaches can be flown differently, but flown to the design, on the track that was flight tested, it will work on any approach. "Newps" wrote in message . .. | | | Jim Macklin wrote: | On a missed approach begun early, prior to reaching the MAP, | climb to the missed approach altitude but do not turn until | reaching the MAP or that point indicated on the chart. If a | turn is indicated, perform that turn as charted, but not | prior to the expected position past the MAP. | | | | From a well known instrument instructor and writer: | | | I don't believe this is true. Follow the instructions WHEREVER you | start the miss, and there is no need to fly to the MAP, UNLESS specified. | | Standard challenge of mine for many decades: Find me an approach | anywhere where executing the miss as stated will get you in trouble | if you miss "early" inside the FAF. | | I've no objection if you DO it to feel good, but I don't believe it | is a REQUIREMENT, built into the system. | | | Best... | John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
The instrument approach provides terrain clearance along and to a limited area either side of the final and missed approach path charted. A climb along the approach path is safe, but if you begin a turn prior to the charted location, you run the risk of hitting an obstruction. Consider a fictional IAP with a missed approach that calls for a right turn and going direct to a fix. If it is an ILS, the miss will start at 200 feet or lower from over the runway. But if you miss on the three mile final and start the turn (and climb) early, you would be about 700 at the start, but could also be abeam a TV tower. Perhaps most missed approaches can be flown differently, but flown to the design, on the track that was flight tested, it will work on any approach. The only time an early turn will assure obstacle clearance is where the missed approach track returns to the final approach fix or facility, such as the LOM or where a VOR station is the FAF. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Silly controller | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 119 | August 30th 06 01:56 AM |
Silly controller | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 123 | August 30th 06 01:56 AM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Approaches and takeoff mins. | jamin3508 | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 14th 05 02:51 AM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |