Question of aborted landing after instrument approach

I quickly studied a few ILS charts for airports for which I know there
are tall antennas nearby. I can't find any examples where a turn before
MAP can cause a problem. The turn always seem to be away from the
antennas, and when there are antennas in the direction of the turn, the
procedure calls for a straight-ahead climb before turning to avoid
those antennas. I am not disputing the TERPS criteria, but the best way
to illustrate these lurking dangers is through real examples instead of
hypothetical ones.





Bob Noel wrote:
In article ,
Newps wrote:

From a well known instrument instructor and writer:


I don't believe this is true. Follow the instructions WHEREVER you
start the miss, and there is no need to fly to the MAP, UNLESS specified.

Standard challenge of mine for many decades: Find me an approach
anywhere where executing the miss as stated will get you in trouble
if you miss "early" inside the FAF.

Well, I don't know of any that actually would have a problem, however, I do
know for a fact that (at least in the 2001 timeframe) the TERPS does NOT
provide for any terrain protection if a missed approach procedure is started
early.

So that well known instrument instructor and writer might want to read up
on the TERPS.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

In article . com,
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote:

I quickly studied a few ILS charts for airports for which I know there
are tall antennas nearby. I can't find any examples where a turn before
MAP can cause a problem. The turn always seem to be away from the
antennas, and when there are antennas in the direction of the turn, the
procedure calls for a straight-ahead climb before turning to avoid
those antennas. I am not disputing the TERPS criteria, but the best way
to illustrate these lurking dangers is through real examples instead of
hypothetical ones.

Just because a danger doesn't exist right now does not mean it can't
occur in the future.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

To add top the answer, a procedure must be designed and
flown so that the same procedure will be safe anywhere.
Having to remember that an early turn is OK at airport
a,b,c... ..., but not at airport u, and v, and OK again at
x,y,z will be dangerous.



"Bob Noel" wrote in
message
...
| In article
. com,
| "Andrew Sarangan" wrote:
|
| I quickly studied a few ILS charts for airports for
which I know there
| are tall antennas nearby. I can't find any examples
where a turn before
| MAP can cause a problem. The turn always seem to be
away from the
| antennas, and when there are antennas in the direction
of the turn, the
| procedure calls for a straight-ahead climb before
turning to avoid
| those antennas. I am not disputing the TERPS criteria,
but the best way
| to illustrate these lurking dangers is through real
examples instead of
| hypothetical ones.
|
| Just because a danger doesn't exist right now does not
mean it can't
| occur in the future.
|
| --
| Bob Noel
| Looking for a sig the
| lawyers will hate
|