![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick" wrote I'd rather not drop my plane with engine G but am looking for a way to just test the gear assembly. Was thinking ; restrain the top connection of the gear leg and apply a uplifting force on wheel via some sort of lever setup. The drop test points out possible shortcomings in the landing gear, but also weaknesses in other critical areas. An engine being dropped and suddenly stopping when the landing gear stops the plane, will put a lot of force on the engine mount and firewall. The wing spar will experience a very high load, if the gear is wing mounted. The aft fuselage will try to bend downward, as the front of the fuselage is also bending downward, so will the fuselage experience too much tension on the top, and too much compression on the bottom? I would propose putting the landing gear on separate roller platforms, so it can experience whatever splaying may result when the gear is highly loaded. Then load the areas with sandbags at the multiple of G's for whatever that part or system weighs. For example, if the drop test is expected to put a 10 G load on the plane, and the engine weighs 200 pounds, you need to stack 2,000 pounds on and around the center of gravity of the engine. Do the same thing for every area of the plane, such as on each wing, and area of the fuselage, and don't forget, that much weight needs to go in the driver's seats, too. g Wow! Typing that out, it is suddenly very clear why people do drop tests, instead of static tests. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just thinking out loud here but thought the +/- 6 G was for airframe, etc
in flight while the landing gear get subjected to considerably less. Vaguely remembering the FAA requirements as 3 times static wheel load dropped 19". I'm thinking 300# on one mains times 3. On the other hand, I could be confused once again G. Comments. Dick "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Dick" wrote I'd rather not drop my plane with engine G but am looking for a way to just test the gear assembly. Was thinking ; restrain the top connection of the gear leg and apply a uplifting force on wheel via some sort of lever setup. The drop test points out possible shortcomings in the landing gear, but also weaknesses in other critical areas. An engine being dropped and suddenly stopping when the landing gear stops the plane, will put a lot of force on the engine mount and firewall. The wing spar will experience a very high load, if the gear is wing mounted. The aft fuselage will try to bend downward, as the front of the fuselage is also bending downward, so will the fuselage experience too much tension on the top, and too much compression on the bottom? I would propose putting the landing gear on separate roller platforms, so it can experience whatever splaying may result when the gear is highly loaded. Then load the areas with sandbags at the multiple of G's for whatever that part or system weighs. For example, if the drop test is expected to put a 10 G load on the plane, and the engine weighs 200 pounds, you need to stack 2,000 pounds on and around the center of gravity of the engine. Do the same thing for every area of the plane, such as on each wing, and area of the fuselage, and don't forget, that much weight needs to go in the driver's seats, too. g Wow! Typing that out, it is suddenly very clear why people do drop tests, instead of static tests. -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick" wrote Just thinking out loud here but thought the +/- 6 G was for airframe, etc in flight while the landing gear get subjected to considerably less. Vaguely remembering the FAA requirements as 3 times static wheel load dropped 19". I'm thinking 300# on one mains times 3. True, the G rating for an airplane is for the airframe, but how many G's would a drop from 19" develop? I don't have the slightest idea. I'm not a wiz on math problems. If a drop from 19" does not stress the plane to more than 3 G's, that would be a wimpy test, in my opinion. A plane dropping in on a blown landing hits with a real whack. How about it, you out there with G meters? How high of a reading have you seen on a really blown landing? It should not be that tough, for a wiz at math to figure out how hard of a whack a 19" drop generates. Take the speed generated, and divide that result out into the amount of suspension travel, I would think. The whole key in the difference is that the G rating for an airframe is generated and suspended by the wings, and the G rating for the landing gear is generated by changing velocity into a stop by the landing gear. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Student practices landing with gear up | steve | Piloting | 53 | August 19th 06 04:46 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
landing gear interface. | Steve Franklin | Piloting | 6 | September 24th 05 03:26 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Navy? C2/COD makes single engine, gear up landing. | Dave S | Piloting | 20 | August 20th 05 10:27 AM |