Question of aborted landing after instrument approach

Newps wrote:


Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

Newps writes:


[...] There is no problem beginning the missed approach early.
There is a huge problem not continuing to the MAP (as you climb,
of course) on an early missed approach.


I'll take that as an I can't.



Well, the burden of proof isn't exactly on him, to search all the
approaches just to justify the plainly written regulatory text.

But here's one for you: KSFF ILS/DME 21R. If one makes the missed
approach left turn before DME 0.7, one might hit that wee 4500-footer
hill directly south of the airport.


I don't see how that would be a problem. The missed is only 10 degrees
off your inbound course.

Try an early turn to JESIE on the KEGE LDA DME Runway 25.

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

I don't see how that would be a problem. The missed is only 10 degrees
off your inbound course.

Try an early turn to JESIE on the KEGE LDA DME Runway 25.


A turn before the VOR would not be following the missed approach procedure,
no matter where the procedure is started. Climbing direct to the VOR, per
the missed approach procedure, from any point on the procedure track prior
to the MAP, would provide adequate clearance.

Stan Prevost wrote:

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

I don't see how that would be a problem. The missed is only 10 degrees
off your inbound course.

Try an early turn to JESIE on the KEGE LDA DME Runway 25.



A turn before the VOR would not be following the missed approach procedure,
no matter where the procedure is started. Climbing direct to the VOR, per
the missed approach procedure, from any point on the procedure track prior
to the MAP, would provide adequate clearance.

I agree. But, that is not what everyone thinks to seem.