![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Dec 2006 21:52:57 -0800, Dan wrote:
My impression that the elevator applied varying levels of downward force to balance the plane about the center of lift. I am not aware that the elevator could even produce _upward_ force on the tail. If it can't produce upward force, then the rear of the plane could be made no lighter than when it is standing still, therefore it could transfer no _additional_ weight to the nosewheel no matter what the control inputs. Where is this logic flawed (seriously, I want to understand if this is wrong...) Airplanes are normally trimmed (and loaded within limits) so the horizontal stabilizer provides a relatively small downward force. This gives positive pitch stability without a major increase in drag. If your model of how the elevator works was valid, it would be impossible for an aircraft to fly inverted since even full down elevator wouldn't be enough to counteract the nose-down pitch moment. You also have to consider that an aircraft on the ground would pitch around an axis passing through the main landing gear, not through the wing's center of lift. ljd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best place for CG along roll axis | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 42 | September 28th 06 04:40 AM |
Crosswind landing | Ron Webb | Home Built | 23 | June 10th 06 03:43 AM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
Tailwheel Crosswind Landing | Piloting | 32 | December 6th 04 02:42 AM | |
Strong crosswind landings! | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 12 | April 19th 04 07:43 PM |