![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Gerber wrote in
: I assume the purpose it serves is it tells them when they can terminate flight following. Alan, VFR flight following is workload permitted basis. So, like you, I have experienced the same, approach asking me to advise airport in sight. Approach can tell you to squawk VFR, have a good day well before you have a visual on VFR flight following. In my area, I have never had that done except once when I was arriving after the ATC shut down for the night. Generally IN MY AREA, if it's that busy, approach much rather you squawk and talk then not. But I am only dealing with C airspace. For IFR, a visual approach requires sight of the airport / runway environment, and ATC cannot terminate your IFR until you request it (I.E cancel IFR like in my case at an uncontrolled airport) or land at a controlled airport. Allen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberma wrote:
Alan Gerber wrote in I assume the purpose it serves is it tells them when they can terminate flight following. VFR flight following is workload permitted basis. I guess I worded that poorly. Of course they can terminate flight following whenever they need to. Once the field is in sight, you pretty much *need* to terminate flight following -- either to contact the tower, for a towered field, or to start talking on CTAF, otherwise. So, like you, I have experienced the same, approach asking me to advise airport in sight. Approach can tell you to squawk VFR, have a good day well before you have a visual on VFR flight following. In my area, I have never had that done except once when I was arriving after the ATC shut down for the night. I've had that done on occasion -- including my long student X-C solo. I assumed they weren't able to do the handoff, especially since they gave me the frequency to try myself later. .... Alan -- Alan Gerber PP-ASEL gerber AT panix DOT com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Alan Gerber wrote: I guess I worded that poorly. Of course they can terminate flight following whenever they need to. Once the field is in sight, you pretty much *need* to terminate flight following -- either to contact the tower, for a towered field, or to start talking on CTAF, otherwise. What if you're just a couple of miles from the field but haven't reported it in sight? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
s.com: What if you're just a couple of miles from the field but haven't reported it in sight? Surely I hope you are not talking from experience on this scenario??? If so, what exactly did happen? On a *clear* day where visibility is above marginal VFR, couple miles from the airport, I am betting what you are describing is a very, very and very rare occurance. And would your workload permit VFR flight following on days where MVFR and IFR traffic are intermingling? What you describe above would **almost** sound like an emergency situation for a lost pilot and nothing near the norm??? Allen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A Lieberma wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in s.com: What if you're just a couple of miles from the field but haven't reported it in sight? Surely I hope you are not talking from experience on this scenario??? Why? If so, what exactly did happen? It hasn't happened with me, it will inevitably happen where controllers do not terminate flight following until pilots report the field in sight. On a *clear* day where visibility is above marginal VFR, couple miles from the airport, I am betting what you are describing is a very, very and very rare occurance. How much are you willing to bet? And would your workload permit VFR flight following on days where MVFR and IFR traffic are intermingling? Yes. What you describe above would **almost** sound like an emergency situation for a lost pilot and nothing near the norm??? Why is that? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
ups.com: On a *clear* day where visibility is above marginal VFR, couple miles from the airport, I am betting what you are describing is a very, very and very rare occurance. How much are you willing to bet? Again, from your experiences, sounds like I am right.... What you describe above would **almost** sound like an emergency situation for a lost pilot and nothing near the norm??? Why is that? Ummm lost pilot doesn't bode well for traffic????? Be realistic, clear day, VMC and the pilot doesn't see the airport within a couple of miles? Sounds like a problem, not the norm. Allen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A Lieberma wrote: Again, from your experiences, sounds like I am right.... Right about what? You never answered my question. Ummm lost pilot doesn't bode well for traffic????? No, why does what I describe **almost** sound like an emergency situation for a lost pilot? Be realistic, clear day, VMC and the pilot doesn't see the airport within a couple of miles? Sounds like a problem, not the norm. No, not if the the pilot doesn't see the field within a couple of miles, if he doesn't see it until he is within a couple of miles. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberma wrote:
Ummm lost pilot doesn't bode well for traffic????? Be realistic, clear day, VMC and the pilot doesn't see the airport within a couple of miles? Sounds like a problem, not the norm. Ever approach an airport with no beacon at night, from the side, not looking directly down the runway? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
What if you're just a couple of miles from the field but haven't reported it in sight? I'm not sure. I wouldn't want to drop from the frequency without flight following being terminated. If I didn't report it because I didn't see it, I'd ask for help finding it. If I didn't report it because I just dropped from the frequency, what would happen? Would it trigger S&R procedures? .... Alan -- Alan Gerber PP-ASEL gerber AT panix DOT com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan Gerber" wrote in message ... What if you're just a couple of miles from the field but haven't reported it in sight? I'm not sure. I wouldn't want to drop from the frequency without flight following being terminated. Why not? If I didn't report it because I didn't see it, I'd ask for help finding it. Would you make that request when you were just a couple of miles from the field, or would you make it a bit earlier than that? If I didn't report it because I just dropped from the frequency, what would happen? Probably nothing. It's not uncommon for VFR pilots to do just that. Would it trigger S&R procedures? No. Loss of radio and radar contact in an area where the controller would expect to have both would trigger a search, but not lass of radio contact alone. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 03:07 PM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 16th 03 11:23 PM |