A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Following question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 06, 02:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default Flight Following question

Stan Prevost wrote:
: Flight Following questionJim, as others have indicated, it can be variable.
: I have had most luck with "Request flight following to destination" or
: "Request to be put into the system for flight following to destination". Or
: you can just file an ATC flight plan for VFR flight following. That
: automatically puts you into the system.

I've got a VFR friend who always files (but doesn't open) an IFR flight plan for longer cross-countries. That way, the
flight is in the system for the whole route, so it's (at least alegedly) easier for the controller to find. Not sure how much
truth there is to that, but it does make some sense.

-Cory


--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
* Electrical Engineering *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #5  
Old December 11th 06, 03:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default Flight Following question


John Clonts wrote:

But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the
controllers would have the strip all along the route, right?


Right.

  #6  
Old December 11th 06, 04:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default Flight Following question

: John Clonts wrote:
:
: But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the
: controllers would have the strip all along the route, right?
:

: Right.

Ooops... that's what I meant to say in my post, but apparently didn't. He
*files* IFR and although doesn't accept an IFR clearance, he does request flight
following after takeoff. So, in that instance the strip *is* in the the system
throughout, making it easier/more likely for FF handoffs?

-Cory

--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
* Electrical Engineering *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #8  
Old December 13th 06, 03:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
LWG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 157
Default Flight Following question

Okay, here's my question. When I get FF on a long trip, often I get handed
off from centers, approaches, etc. to my destination. I have been put "in
the system" along the way. How do controllers do that so the handoff
happens? Does the original entry into the system generate P strips along
the route like an IFR flight? If so, how do they do it so that the flight
is not IFR? Do they "force" the VFR aspect like this thread has been
discussing? Is the handoff automatic, or does it get coordinated by land
line, or both?

But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the
controllers would have the strip all along the route, right?



  #9  
Old December 13th 06, 04:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Flight Following question



LWG wrote:
Okay, here's my question. When I get FF on a long trip, often I get handed
off from centers, approaches, etc. to my destination. I have been put "in
the system" along the way.


By the very first controller.



How do controllers do that so the handoff
happens?


Very similar to IFR aircraft. I put in N number, Destination, Type and
Altitude. In that order and hit enter. Out spits a center code.


Does the original entry into the system generate P strips along
the route like an IFR flight?


Yes.



If so, how do they do it so that the flight
is not IFR?


The process I listed above is VFR only. The other way is to use the
other computer and enter a flight plan and use VFR/075 as an altitude.
Either one results in a VFR tag.





Do they "force" the VFR aspect like this thread has been
discussing?



They both result in a VFR tag and strips.





Is the handoff automatic,


It is automated. Each facility can make the handoff automatic with some
massaging of the software. Normally the controller will have to take a
positive action to effect the handoff. He'll use his electronic cursor,
slew out and enter on the aircraft and hit enter.



or does it get coordinated by land
line, or both?


It can always be manually handed off via the landline.




But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the
controllers would have the strip all along the route, right?


Yep.

  #10  
Old December 13th 06, 09:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
KP[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Flight Following question

"LWG" wrote in message
...
Okay, here's my question. When I get FF on a long trip, often I get
handed off from centers, approaches, etc. to my destination. I have been
put "in the system" along the way. How do controllers do that so the
handoff happens? Does the original entry into the system generate P
strips along the route like an IFR flight? If so, how do they do it so
that the flight is not IFR? Do they "force" the VFR aspect like this
thread has been discussing? Is the handoff automatic, or does it get
coordinated by land line, or both?

But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the
controllers would have the strip all along the route, right?


Years ago, when radar was steam powered and the tower's light guns burned
whale oil, there were two semi-separate "flightplan" systems: ARTS which
generated the datablocks on the radar indicator and FDEP (later called FDIO)
which generated the paper flight progress strips.

Separate because there were two different keyboards to enter data and two
different formats for entering that data. Each controller had an ARTS
keyboard at his position but in terminal facilities there were usually only
one or two FDEP keyboards. These were located at the Flight Data or
Clearance Delivery positions away from working sector controllers.

Semi-separate because while the FDEP not only generated the paper strip it
also generated a datablock with a center transponder code and sent
everything to every facility along the aircraft's proposed route, the ARTS
did not. ARTS datablocks used local codes and remained solely within the
facility generating them. They were also much easier to create requiring
less info and fewer keystrokes.

So now the stage is set for a couple scenarios:

Scenario 1. Mister VFR aircraft files a VFR flightplan into the IFR system
which generates the strip and center code datablock in the originating and
subsequent facilities' airspace. He then calls CD, gets the center code,
tags up on departure, is handed off to each facility along his route, and
receives FF all during his flight. Everybody's happy unless or until:

-One or more of the facilities has inhibited the processing of VFR flight
data
-One controller is too busy to provide FF, terminates radar service and
drops the datablock which removes it from the FDEP and therefore all the
remaining facilities along the route
-The next controller is too busy to accept the handoff and the track gets
dropped (see above)
-For some reason the aircraft doesn't immediately tag up so on initial
contact the controller thinks it's a pop-up and enters the data into the
ARTS. This either generates a series of computer input error messages for
"dupe ID" (bad) or a local datablock on a local code (not too bad).
Depending on how the controller decides to sort all this out the aircraft
may stay in the system or it may get dropped

Scenario 2a. Mister VFR airplane pops up on freq and requests FF (either
initially or because he got dropped somewhere along the route). The
controller enters the simple data in ARTS format into his readily available
ARTS keyboard, issues the local transponder code, gets an ARTS generated
datablock (which is all he needs to keep track of the airplane), and
workload permitting, provides FF within his airspace. Easy.

Scenario 2b. Mister VFR aircraft calls and in addition to the ARTS entries,
the controller gets on the intercom to CD/FD to have that controller enter
the more detailed info into the FDEP or if CD/FD's not staffed, gets up,
goes to the FDEP keyboard, enters the info into the FDEP, waits for the
center computer to generate the strip and datablock with the center code,
issues the new code to the aircraft, waits for the new datablock to tag up,
then provides FF within his airspace. A PITA.

In Scenario 2a when the aircraft nears the limit of his airspace the
controller terminates radar, drops the local datablock, and he's done.

In Scenario 2b, the controller can start the automated handoff to center,
wait for center to accept or refuse, transfer communications if accepted or
terminate radar if refused, and then he's done.

That's how it worked in the past.

Maybe in the last few years or so the FAA has actually integrated the
systems, streamlined the procedures, and hired a whole bunch of controllers
who really like to do a bunch of extra work for VFR aircraft.

Sure they have.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
IFR use of handheld GPS [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 251 May 19th 06 02:04 PM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.