![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Natalie wrote: Newps wrote: Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? The tower will know if you landed. What did you think happened? I don't know how it happens, but the requirement is that they're supposed to notice whether I have arrived at my destination not whether I was handed off by approach. This means one of two things: 1. Tower must tell the system that I've landed. 2. Tower must tell the system that I haven't landed. The tower is "the system". At a tower without radar the approach control will call on the landline and tell them about the IFR inbound. At the agreed upon time/place the approach control tells the aircraft to contact tower. Aircraft lands. Tower goes back to conversation on how bad the Bears quarterback really is. The only time the tower calls the approach control back is if something unusual happens. Aircraft never calls tower at the expected time, aircraft has some kind of problem that requires him to manuver unexpectedly thereby possibly affecting separation of others inbound or outbound, etc. A normal approach and landing is what's expected. In a tower with radar all the above happens without a call on the landline. The transfer of information is automated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote: Newps wrote: Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? The tower will know if you landed. What did you think happened? I don't know how it happens, but the requirement is that they're supposed to notice whether I have arrived at my destination not whether I was handed off by approach. This means one of two things: 1. Tower must tell the system that I've landed. 2. Tower must tell the system that I haven't landed. The tower is "the system". At a tower without radar the approach control will call on the landline and tell them about the IFR inbound. At the agreed upon time/place the approach control tells the aircraft to contact tower. Aircraft lands. Tower goes back to conversation on how bad the Bears quarterback really is. The only time the tower calls the approach control back is if something unusual happens. Aircraft never calls tower at the expected time, aircraft has some kind of problem that requires him to manuver unexpectedly thereby possibly affecting separation of others inbound or outbound, etc. A normal approach and landing is what's expected. In a tower with radar all the above happens without a call on the landline. The transfer of information is automated. In the case of the nonradar tower, does the flight just "expire" in the computer or does the approach controller kill the flight once the hand-off to tower has been confirmed? If the pilot misses the approach and then pops back to approach, do they have to enter the flight back into the computer? Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Whiting wrote: In the case of the nonradar tower, does the flight just "expire" in the computer or does the approach controller kill the flight once the hand-off to tower has been confirmed? If the pilot misses the approach and then pops back to approach, do they have to enter the flight back into the computer? The computer is used for processing and transmitting flight data. The destination airport is the end of the line. There's nobody left to notify. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Whiting wrote: In the case of the nonradar tower, does the flight just "expire" in the computer or does the approach controller kill the flight once the hand-off to tower has been confirmed? You are thinking it's like a VFR flight plan where somebody has to take some action to stop SAR from beginning. Nobody is on the clock with an IFR flight plan. If the pilot misses the approach and then pops back to approach, do they have to enter the flight back into the computer? No. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 03:07 PM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 16th 03 11:23 PM |