A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Following question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 06, 06:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
A Lieberma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default Flight Following question

Newps wrote in
:

I understand that. It's a routing issue. Perhaps DUAT doesn't allow
you to file VFR/125 as your altitude on your IFR flightplan. That is
a limitation written into the computer program, not anything from FAA.


You are pretty much reiterating what I am trying to say.....

You don't receive VFR flight plans when WE FILE THEM. You only receive
IFR flight plans. (your words above as well!)

Now, with that in mind, the system is "fudged" to receive a VFR flight
plan, by us (pilots) selecting IFR to generate a strip.

No matter what happens on your end, it's FILED as an IFR flight plan.

And yes, until I accept the clearance, it's nothing more then a strip of
paper on your end, and when you see VFR altitude on your end, you revise
that filing to a VFR flight, and I call in to activate the flight plan.

Notice I am saying activate, and not accept a clearance as I fully
understand you don't "clear to" VFR flight plans.

It may be a matter of semantics, but in order for you to receive a strip,
an IFR flight plan has to be filed, thus the deliniation of type in box 1
for routing purposes.

What you do with it on the other end (ATC) is a totally different issue.

I just see this as fudging the system to force a way of flight following,
which in my opinion IS NOT a bad thing, just another way of working the
system.

Of course the pilot would need to know what he is doing would be accepted
as a workload permitted basis and not expect it to work every time.

Allen
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
IFR use of handheld GPS [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 251 May 19th 06 02:04 PM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.