A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Following question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 11th 06, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jim Carter[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 403
Default Flight Following question



-----Original Message-----
From: Newps ]
Posted At: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:37 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: Flight Following question
Subject: Flight Following question

....
Just file a regular IFR and pick it up how you normally do. When you
get to the point you want to be VFR tell the controller you want to
cancel and receive FF.


Duh!! That makes perfect sense; I don't know why I was following the VFR
altitude for IFR plan thread. Of course that prompts another question:
if its that easy to get FF then why bother with the IFR / VFR finagle to
start with? Why not just do as you suggest and file IFR with the
intention of cancelling over to FF after departure?

It can't be that we've got non-instrument rated pilots filing IFR plans
can it?

  #2  
Old December 11th 06, 02:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Flight Following question



Jim Carter wrote:
Of course that prompts another question:
if its that easy to get FF then why bother with the IFR / VFR finagle to
start with? Why not just do as you suggest and file IFR with the
intention of cancelling over to FF after departure?




You have to be an instrument pilot to start out IFR.




It can't be that we've got non-instrument rated pilots filing IFR plans
can it?


It's OK to file, not OK to accept an IFR flight plan.


  #3  
Old December 11th 06, 03:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mark Hansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 420
Default Flight Following question

On 12/10/06 18:45, Jim Carter wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Newps ]
Posted At: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:37 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: Flight Following question
Subject: Flight Following question

...
Just file a regular IFR and pick it up how you normally do. When you
get to the point you want to be VFR tell the controller you want to
cancel and receive FF.


Duh!! That makes perfect sense; I don't know why I was following the VFR
altitude for IFR plan thread. Of course that prompts another question:
if its that easy to get FF then why bother with the IFR / VFR finagle to
start with? Why not just do as you suggest and file IFR with the
intention of cancelling over to FF after departure?

It can't be that we've got non-instrument rated pilots filing IFR plans
can it?


Consider also that departing IFR may mean delays and departure routes contrary
to what you may be able to get if you depart VFR.




--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA
  #4  
Old December 12th 06, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jim Carter[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 403
Default Flight Following question



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hansen ]
Posted At: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:22 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: Flight Following question
Subject: Flight Following question

....
Consider also that departing IFR may mean delays and departure routes
contrary
to what you may be able to get if you depart VFR.




--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA


Very true Mark. In the case of KLIT however, the IFR departures seem to
get the routes they want and the VFR departures all get R or L turn to
270, maintain 2000' or lower until further advised. Seeing you're from
SAC I suspect things are quite a bit different on that side of the hill.

  #5  
Old December 12th 06, 03:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mark Hansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 420
Default Flight Following question

On 12/11/06 17:20, Jim Carter wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hansen ]
Posted At: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:22 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: Flight Following question
Subject: Flight Following question

...
Consider also that departing IFR may mean delays and departure routes
contrary
to what you may be able to get if you depart VFR.




Very true Mark. In the case of KLIT however, the IFR departures seem to
get the routes they want and the VFR departures all get R or L turn to
270, maintain 2000' or lower until further advised. Seeing you're from
SAC I suspect things are quite a bit different on that side of the hill.


I dunno, really ;-) My only IFR departures so far have been training or
local practice flights, most of which head straight for the local VOR
station before going on course anyway.

However, I was speaking in generalities. I'm sure there are some airports
where this won't be an issue, but I thought it was worth consideration
while planning what type of departure is appropriate for the flight.

Best,



--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
IFR use of handheld GPS [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 251 May 19th 06 02:04 PM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.