![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "FLAV8R" wrote in message ... That would depend on what has the greater resistance, the air in front of the plane or the belt on the treadmill. No, it would not depend on that at all. Both of those effects are creating a resistance in the same direction, and thus are additive. Which one is greater is irrelevant. The only relevant question is whether they combined exceed the thrust from the engines. They don't even come close to doing that, and so the engines can easily push the airplane forward to a high enough speed for flight. [...] You can equate it to an airboat in a river. Will the river push the airboat down stream or will the propulsion of the engine move it forward? It's similar, yes. Except that the drag due to friction from the treadmill is miniscule, whereas hydrodynamic drag is significant. Pete As pictured, the runway is much to short, which is just as well since the uprights of the treadmill would impinge on the wings. bfg Actually, I agree that the drag from the treadmill is trivial. Therefore, if sufficient distance was provided to accellerate to an appropriate airspeed, the only problem would be the maximum speed rating of the tires. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |