![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
karl gruber wrote:
The way I remember it was, that it was extensively used as a trainer and many were lost on power cuts right after takeoff. I think VMC stayed the same but the FAA stopped requiring low level power cuts. They also introduced "Single engine safety speed," which the Twin Comanche was the first to receive. Now that I have not heard about. I do know that the Twin Comanche's Vmc was raised from 80mph to 90mph. In the interests of safety for mel training accidents. The laminar flow wing of the Comanche makes it fast and efficient but less forgiving and it quits flying more abruptly than some other wings. I am not sure if the PA39 (the CR version) had the same VMC... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Narrowing it down... Comanche? | Jim Carter | Owning | 81 | March 21st 06 05:06 AM |
aftermarket de-ice for Twin Comanche | Dico | Owning | 1 | February 5th 06 05:51 PM |
Twin Comanche comparisons | Dico | Owning | 6 | January 30th 06 06:00 PM |
Comanche accident averted last evening | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | April 13th 05 10:02 AM |
AOPA Twin Comanche | Rosspilot | Piloting | 79 | December 8th 04 07:23 PM |