FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ

http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

FAI only records the records that it recognizes. For example, FAI does not
recognize microlight records for speed over a recognized course, but the NAA
does recognize those.

"Al G" wrote in message
...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...


snip

Among Campbell's many other lofty accomplishments are his 1981 Ultralight
World
Record High Altitude flight to 21,210 feet over Lakehurst, New Jersey

Really? Wouldn't the FAI know about it? A google search "FAI Campbell"
comes up with a Sue Campbell, but I didn't see a James. What am I missing?

Al G






--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
no record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan wrote:
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
no record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

As in, "No Guts, No Glory!" Or, "You had to be there!" LOL!

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.



Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of
said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the
aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its
original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the
attempt? If so, who was this disinterested party and what organization,
if any, does he represent? Notary public? OK, what is his seal number
and state?

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to
be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. It's just that
simple. You claim to have been a Marine, what would have happened to you
if you wore an unauthorized award, decoration or other distinctive
insignia on your uniform? It's all about integrity. I have seen
documentation of cambell's impersonation of a doctor, parachute
instructor etc. That is sufficient for me to doubt his claiming this
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

As a publisher he should care what people think of him. I used to
read ANN, but don't anymore. He's a proven liar which makes me suspect
everything he says.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims
without providing any proof of your own.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

The last time somebody went to the source, the source was last seen
running "DOWN" the "UP" elevator, cowardly piece of filth that he is.
There are numerous records of confrontations being attempted to get
explanation from the source ~ from the Horse's Ass, if you will ~ but
Jimbo the Rocket Clown loves nothing more than to run.

It's your friend the pendejo that has no cojones, only running shoes
and fast ones at that. I'm surprised he hasn't claimed the records of
Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens at this point. When it comes to the Rocket
Racer he's going to fly, I suspect it won't be a velocity, but a rocket
powered Nike of enormous proportions. In fact, was he just in Manitou
Springs, Colorado? They had a coffin race here with one dressed up as
a Rocket Ship with .50 caliber machine guns. I thought it might have
been Zoom's and was saddened not to find him in it, lying vertically
and holding Lillies, of course. That flower would go very well with
his liver...not to mention a nice Chianti and some Fava
beans...slurp...slurp...slurp.

But that's all right...someone's going to get to the source real soon.
He's got a lot to answer for, but when it comes to good reasons or good
excuses, or even bad ones, he's going to be empty-handed when it comes
to Lawful Right.

When you finally find him in the pit of quicksand he's made for
himself, do me a favor ~ do us all a favor ~ hand him an anvil or a
cannon ball. Try and make it quick. We don't care if "quick" equates
to "painless" for Jimbo the Glory Slut...we just want him gone.

And whatever you do, don't make the mistake of stepping into the
quicksand with him. It's not too late...despite your comments.

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what
he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

As a publisher he should care what people think of him.

Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
providing any proof of your own.

What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Oh, so Campbell sent you here to rehash his grandiose Barnstorming
piece...

Why bother...no one wants to read his lies, let alone yours.