FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.



Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of
said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the
aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its
original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the
attempt? If so, who was this disinterested party and what organization,
if any, does he represent? Notary public? OK, what is his seal number
and state?

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to
be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. It's just that
simple. You claim to have been a Marine, what would have happened to you
if you wore an unauthorized award, decoration or other distinctive
insignia on your uniform? It's all about integrity. I have seen
documentation of cambell's impersonation of a doctor, parachute
instructor etc. That is sufficient for me to doubt his claiming this
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

As a publisher he should care what people think of him. I used to
read ANN, but don't anymore. He's a proven liar which makes me suspect
everything he says.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims
without providing any proof of your own.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All
bark, no bite.

The last time somebody went to the source, the source was last seen
running "DOWN" the "UP" elevator, cowardly piece of filth that he is.
There are numerous records of confrontations being attempted to get
explanation from the source ~ from the Horse's Ass, if you will ~ but
Jimbo the Rocket Clown loves nothing more than to run.

It's your friend the pendejo that has no cojones, only running shoes
and fast ones at that. I'm surprised he hasn't claimed the records of
Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens at this point. When it comes to the Rocket
Racer he's going to fly, I suspect it won't be a velocity, but a rocket
powered Nike of enormous proportions. In fact, was he just in Manitou
Springs, Colorado? They had a coffin race here with one dressed up as
a Rocket Ship with .50 caliber machine guns. I thought it might have
been Zoom's and was saddened not to find him in it, lying vertically
and holding Lillies, of course. That flower would go very well with
his liver...not to mention a nice Chianti and some Fava
beans...slurp...slurp...slurp.

But that's all right...someone's going to get to the source real soon.
He's got a lot to answer for, but when it comes to good reasons or good
excuses, or even bad ones, he's going to be empty-handed when it comes
to Lawful Right.

When you finally find him in the pit of quicksand he's made for
himself, do me a favor ~ do us all a favor ~ hand him an anvil or a
cannon ball. Try and make it quick. We don't care if "quick" equates
to "painless" for Jimbo the Glory Slut...we just want him gone.

And whatever you do, don't make the mistake of stepping into the
quicksand with him. It's not too late...despite your comments.

"DABEAR" wrote in message
ups.com...
Juan Jimenez wrote:

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
All
bark, no bite.

The last time somebody went to the source, the source was last seen
running "DOWN" the "UP" elevator, cowardly piece of filth that he is.

Oh, please, take your prepubescent postings somewhere else. Last time I saw
someone go up to "the source" there were plenty of people around Campbell
and most of them have more aviation experience in their pinkies than you can
muster in your lifetime, Mark. I happened to be with him at the XPrize Cup.
Where were you? Toilet?

mercy snip



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Oh, please, take your prepubescent postings somewhere else. Last time I saw
someone go up to "the source" there were plenty of people around Campbell
and most of them have more aviation experience in their pinkies than you can
muster in your lifetime, Mark. I happened to be with him at the XPrize Cup.
Where were you? Toilet?

Flame ON

Well, then you're making a fool out of yourself because there is no
escalator at the X Prize facility in Mojave, if that's the one your
referring to. The incidents I referred to occurred in a Florida Mall,
Oshkosh and Sun 'N Fun.

I was also at the X Prize in Mojave...glad I didn't see you there
because I can handle just so much ignorance and BS out of a person in
day's time.

As for prepubescent postings, coming from the Human Version of the
Penis Enlargement Pump Owned By The Biggest, Most Cowardly Liar On
Earth, I take that as high praise!

Thanks Juan!

So, what's the deal...you two were in prison together and fell in
love!? LOL!

Oh, by the way, from the information I have, Campbell makes it a point
to run to groups of people so that he has a lot of people around him
because the coward doesn't want to get his ass beat!

One of these times, that's not going to help him.

So, why don't you dribble some intelligence out of your mouth instead
of the penile effluent of Jimbo the Rocket Clown? The only
documentation you have to support your claims is yourself and no other.
Jimbo has a thirty year record of criminal misconduct posted on the
internet already that disputes everything you spew.

Put that in your BD-5J and "Smoke It!" The hard way, if you get my
drift.

Flame OFF

Oh, and as for my Aviation experience, you have no knowledge of what I
know, so how do you make an intelligent contrast between those Campbell
sucks up to in a moment of absolute terror and what my education and
experience are?

Remember, he has six months of military experience that looks like it
ended with a less than honorable discharge. I have a DD-214 that
outlines my Aviation experience, among other things, along with an
Honorable Discharge, an RE Code of 1A, and a couple of Soldier of the
Year titles with it.

Go back to your boyfriend and wait for the hammer to fall...right on
your heads. I have a bigger complaint with those aiding and abetting
Campbell and his criminal misconduct than I do with the mental
defective himself. When he drug into a Federal Court to answer all the
charges, he's going to be whimpering, crying, whining...much like you
do here...and doing his damndest to claim he's Mentally Ill and
"innocent" as a result.

He should have gotten help, or at a minimum, I'm wondering if his
friends ~ people like you ~ are really his true friends by not urging
him to seek help and get his schizophrenia under control.

Also, Juan, if you and Jim are such great Journalists, why do you
trample all over the Freedom of Speech possessed by others? I mean
seriously, "take my comments elsewhere!?" From a "Noble Journalist"
such as yourself?

The fact is I spread these comments through my internet Press sites.
You'd better believe I'm taking them elsewhere, because anything I can
do to expose Jim Campbell for the creep and fraud that he is, is a GOOD
THING! ~ but I'm still posting here!

And how is it that we should consider you omnipotent when you have no
documentation, nor even Jim Campbell backing up your claims, nor Jim
Campbell even listing you at his website anymore ~ while thirty years
of documentation, medical records, court cases and transcripts, Police
complaints, et al, fly in the face of your blatant, mornic, prissy "I'M
ALWAYS RIGHT!" behavior!!??

Oh! I'm sorry! That's Right! You were trained by Campbell!

Hey, well, what can I say!? The leash looks good on you! But the
collar's a little butch...don't ya think!?

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?

Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.

I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what
he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

As a publisher he should care what people think of him.

Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
providing any proof of your own.

What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses
no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?
Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given
no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.
I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what
he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

As a publisher he should care what people think of him.

Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
providing any proof of your own.

What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?

You keep piping up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1

Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No
witnesses no
record.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in
the
article? chuckle Get over it.
Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of
said
barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the
aircraft
and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original
seal
and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt?
Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so,
given no
one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source.
All
bark, no bite.

My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be
taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a
controlling
authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand.
I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of
what he
did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your
chance.

Juan

As a publisher he should care what people think of him.

Perhaps he doesn't care what YOU think.

On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without
providing any proof of your own.

What makes you think I care what you think about what I post here, Dan?

You keep piping up.

As opposed to the gaggle coming out from under the rock every once in a
while and getting its nuts squashed, then forced to slime back under the
rock?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com