Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware !

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in
:

That's a part of the maintenance record.

Tell you what, I'll ask you a simple point-blank question: do you think
that not disclosing important information about the history of an aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do? Do you engage in this type
of behaviour when you sell aircraft, cars, or anything else that might
remotely fall under this category?

Over here, I am selling a BD-5J Microjet. Not only do I disclose the
history of the aircraft, which includes an in-transit damage issue that was
repaired by the original builder, I even post pictures of it on my website
for everyone to see. Just in case you're thinking about turning the
question around to me.

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Tell you what, I'll ask you a simple point-blank question: do you think
that not disclosing important information about the history of an aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do?

No, but I regard letting a prospective buyer read the logbooks as disclosure.

George Patterson
None of us is as dumb as all of us.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Juan Jimenez wrote:

Tell you what, I'll ask you a simple point-blank question: do you think
that not disclosing important information about the history of an
aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do?

No, but I regard letting a prospective buyer read the logbooks as
disclosure.

Anything else is just your "opinion" regarding something being wrong.

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in
:


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Juan Jimenez wrote:

Tell you what, I'll ask you a simple point-blank question: do you
think that not disclosing important information about the history
of an
aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do?

No, but I regard letting a prospective buyer read the logbooks as
disclosure.

Anything else is just your "opinion" regarding something being wrong.

What goes around, comes around, Tom. Remember that.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


... do you think
that not disclosing important information about the history of an
aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do?

No, but I regard letting a prospective buyer read the logbooks as
disclosure.


Kind of takes caveat emptor to a whole new level doesn't it?

--
Jim Carter

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
news
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


... do you think
that not disclosing important information about the history of an
aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do?

No, but I regard letting a prospective buyer read the logbooks as
disclosure.


Kind of takes caveat emptor to a whole new level doesn't it?

Yeah, a new LOW level.

"Jim Carter" wrote in news5WCc.2862$531.143
@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


... do you think
that not disclosing important information about the history of an
aircraft
to a potential buyer is an ethical thing to do?

No, but I regard letting a prospective buyer read the logbooks as
disclosure.


Kind of takes caveat emptor to a whole new level doesn't it?


chuckle