A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Courious Crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 19th 06, 01:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Courious Crash

§ 23.969 Fuel tank expansion space.
Each fuel tank must have an expansion space of not less than
two percent of the tank capacity, unless the tank vent
discharges clear of the airplane (in which case no expansion
space is required). It must be impossible to fill the
expansion space inadvertently with the airplane in the
normal ground attitude.

"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message
...
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| From: Jose
|
| If a tank is completely topped off in the cool evening
air, how much gas
| will pour overboard when the wing heats up in the noonday
sun?
|
| I know - "it depends". Let's take as an example a
cherokee 24 gallon
| wing, 45 degrees at night, 80 degrees under hot spring
sun. Or
| something similar. Could one lose more than a gallon per
tank?
|
| A quick look at the Marks' Mechanical Engineers Handbook
puts
| the coefficient of expansion at about .0007.
| So I'd tend to say no.
| You're probably looking at a little over a half gallon.
|
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Version: N/A
|
|
iQCVAwUBRYem+JMoscYxZNI5AQF09QQAmrNzWVb46u3Kp+PszB zVMBUUbnoXuRgi
|
BFoBxHBILrW4E0uLNlsv9SOpqhEYDffH52OGOp3QUrzb4LPnMo pMbucqldy9QdaV
|
V5MS8hMA0e0EO7XamlvaK77Rx2lp3mos/Viot31mWwNtnzLnAxot/9imkyOctIfC
| TxaJ3pMZdBw=
| =/h7e
| -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|


  #2  
Old December 19th 06, 04:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Courious Crash

§ 23.969 Fuel tank expansion space.
Each fuel tank must have an expansion space of not less than
two percent of the tank capacity, unless the tank vent
discharges clear of the airplane (in which case no expansion
space is required). It must be impossible to fill the
expansion space inadvertently with the airplane in the
normal ground attitude.


I don't know whether cherokees have expansion space, but they do have a
fuel vent that vents fuel "clear of the airplane" (as far as I can tell).

However, I would infer from the reg that 2% would be typical of expected
expansion. So, half a gallon loss out of a 24 gallon tank would not be
outrageous.

Am I missing something?

Jose
--
"There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows
what they are." - (mike).
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old December 20th 06, 12:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Courious Crash

§ 23.969 Fuel tank expansion space.
Each fuel tank must have an expansion space of not less than
two percent of the tank capacity, unless the tank vent
discharges clear of the airplane (in which case no expansion
space is required). It must be impossible to fill the
expansion space inadvertently with the airplane in the
normal ground attitude.


I don't know whether cherokees have expansion space, but they do have a
fuel vent that vents fuel "clear of the airplane" (as far as I can tell).

However, I would infer from the reg that 2% would be typical of expected
expansion. So, half a gallon loss out of a 24 gallon tank would not be
outrageous.

Am I missing something?

Jose
--

I suspect that it means that the expected loss is much less. They probably
wanted to ensure that no fuel is leaked inside the aircraft over the widest
expected range of temperature and a reasonable range of attidudes--such as a
flat tire and/or a sloping ramp.

Peter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 Mike Naval Aviation 0 May 6th 06 11:13 PM
Pilot claims no blame in July crash Mortimer Schnerd, RN Piloting 48 March 15th 06 09:00 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Doubts raised in jet crash Dave Butler Piloting 8 July 26th 05 01:25 AM
Yet another A36 crash H.P. Piloting 10 April 23rd 05 05:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.