![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christopher Campbell" wrote in message e.com... On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:51:55 -0800, Matt Whiting wrote (in article ): Christopher Campbell wrote: I think there is something wrong with charging a guy with murder because he did not have a piece of paper from the government. Charging someone with murder for flying without a license is pure vindictiveness -- punishment for daring to defy governmental authority. It is not any more dangerous to fly without a license than with one. You should only be charged for murder if reckless behavior led to a death. I have no problem with charging him with murder if he was drunk. So if someone who had never been to medical school posed as a surgeon and operated on your wife or child and killed them, you'd be OK if they weren't charged with murder? After all, a medical license is just a piece of paper from the government. He should be charged for murder if he made mistakes in procedure that would not be expected of a licensed surgeon. He should not be charged with murder simply because he did not have a license. He should be charged with murder because of actual reckless behavior, not for simple non-compliance with a government regulation. The lack of a license is prima fascia evidence that he does not have the skills. It would then shift the burden of proof to him to prove that he did. This would count for brain surgery or flying. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
The lack of a license is prima fascia evidence that he does not have the skills. No. The possession of a license is prima facie evidence that he has the skills, but the converse is not true. Many people may have the skills but choose not to get the license. There are far fewer people who do not have the skills and yet manage to get the license. It would then shift the burden of proof to him to prove that he did. Having an accident can be pretty good evidence that he lacked skill. Not having an accident can be pretty good evidence that he had skill. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sports Pilot Television Expands Market Coverage | AJ | Piloting | 0 | April 10th 06 11:17 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 05:45 AM |
Taylor: Pilot should have been charged | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 04 09:38 PM |