A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pilot charged with Manslaughter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 22nd 06, 02:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Pilot charged with Manslaughter


"Christopher Campbell" wrote in message
e.com...
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:51:55 -0800, Matt Whiting wrote
(in article ):

Christopher Campbell wrote:

I think there is something wrong with charging a guy with murder because
he
did not have a piece of paper from the government. Charging someone with
murder for flying without a license is pure vindictiveness -- punishment
for
daring to defy governmental authority. It is not any more dangerous to
fly
without a license than with one. You should only be charged for murder
if
reckless behavior led to a death. I have no problem with charging him
with
murder if he was drunk.


So if someone who had never been to medical school posed as a surgeon
and operated on your wife or child and killed them, you'd be OK if they
weren't charged with murder? After all, a medical license is just a
piece of paper from the government.


He should be charged for murder if he made mistakes in procedure that
would
not be expected of a licensed surgeon. He should not be charged with
murder
simply because he did not have a license. He should be charged with murder
because of actual reckless behavior, not for simple non-compliance with a
government regulation.



The lack of a license is prima fascia evidence that he does not have the
skills. It would then shift the burden of proof to him to prove that he did.
This would count for brain surgery or flying.


  #2  
Old December 23rd 06, 05:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Pilot charged with Manslaughter

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

The lack of a license is prima fascia evidence that he does not have the
skills.


No. The possession of a license is prima facie evidence that he has
the skills, but the converse is not true. Many people may have the
skills but choose not to get the license. There are far fewer people
who do not have the skills and yet manage to get the license.

It would then shift the burden of proof to him to prove that he did.


Having an accident can be pretty good evidence that he lacked skill.
Not having an accident can be pretty good evidence that he had skill.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Sports Pilot Television Expands Market Coverage AJ Piloting 0 April 10th 06 11:17 PM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? Blueskies Piloting 14 July 12th 05 05:45 AM
Taylor: Pilot should have been charged Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 8th 04 09:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.