Beechcraft sold

Robert M. Gary writes:

That's the old zero sum myth.

No, it's the reality of recent years, and one reason why economies
aren't as stable as they use to be.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Robert M. Gary writes:

That's the old zero sum myth.

No, it's the reality of recent years, and one reason why economies
aren't as stable as they use to be.

If it was a zero sum game, no reasonable company would bother merging
or buying another. It makes no economic sense if you can't leverage the
action for more than the sum of the two.

-Robert

The WSJ had a little more information on Onyx.
They are purchasing aviation assests where they can find them.
They purchased a former Boeing division and are not contracting with
Boeing to produce fuselages.
The Raytheon Beechcraft contract works and new carbon fiber facilities
tie in nicely with this model.
I believe there are a couple of other companies they have purchased
which are also in this line of work.
Onyx is also in a hostile takeover bid for Quantas.

Robert M. Gary wrote:

Mxsmanic wrote:


Robert M. Gary writes:



That's the old zero sum myth.


No, it's the reality of recent years, and one reason why economies
aren't as stable as they use to be.



If it was a zero sum game, no reasonable company would bother merging
or buying another. It makes no economic sense if you can't leverage the
action for more than the sum of the two.

-Robert

Sounds like they have a plan they aren't telling anyone about.

"john smith" wrote in message
...
The WSJ had a little more information on Onyx.
They are purchasing aviation assests where they can find them.
They purchased a former Boeing division and are not contracting with
Boeing to produce fuselages.
The Raytheon Beechcraft contract works and new carbon fiber facilities tie
in nicely with this model.
I believe there are a couple of other companies they have purchased which
are also in this line of work.
Onyx is also in a hostile takeover bid for Quantas.

Robert M. Gary wrote:

Mxsmanic wrote:

Robert M. Gary writes:


That's the old zero sum myth.

No, it's the reality of recent years, and one reason why economies
aren't as stable as they use to be.


If it was a zero sum game, no reasonable company would bother merging
or buying another. It makes no economic sense if you can't leverage the
action for more than the sum of the two.

-Robert

john smith wrote:
The WSJ had a little more information on Onyx.
They are purchasing aviation assests where they can find them.
They purchased a former Boeing division and are not contracting with
Boeing to produce fuselages.

Which Boeing unit?

Boeing Commercial in Wichita. The military plant is still
Boeing.



"Blanche" wrote in message
...
| john smith wrote:
| The WSJ had a little more information on Onyx.
| They are purchasing aviation assests where they can find
them.
| They purchased a former Boeing division and are not
contracting with
| Boeing to produce fuselages.
|
| Which Boeing unit?
|

Robert M. Gary writes:

If it was a zero sum game, no reasonable company would bother merging
or buying another.

It is indeed a zero sum game. What people in the financial world try
to do is shift the money away from others and towards themselves.
They don't actually produce anything in the process. When they win,
someone loses.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.