A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 23rd 06, 03:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Shawn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

Marc Ramsey wrote:
Soarin Again wrote:
At 05:42 23 December 2006, Js wrote:
306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!

Yes, it is.
Anyone trying to beat that record should be certain
their parachute is
in good shape, as the number of wings will likely total
zero.
Jim


Does anyone know if his Nimbus 4DM has had special
modifications to increase the vne at altitude, or does
he just not care about operating limitations?


306 km/hr true airspeed is 200 to 220 km/hr IAS at the 20000+ foot
altitudes used for these wave flights. Some gliders do require a
reduction in Vne at higher altitudes, but it isn't necessarily the case
that the limitation was exceeded.


I find these sorts of discussions amusing. Do F1 drivers religiously
follow redline engine speeds or anticipated braking limits for
conditions when they're out to beat the next guy?
Breaking records in aircraft is not analogous to driving the family SUV
to the mall, or the 1-26 around a silver distance triangle. Speed
limits and safe and reasonable don't apply. If it wasn't pushing the
envelope, we'd all be doing it.
My $ 0.02.


Shawn
  #2  
Old December 23rd 06, 04:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
J. Nieuwenhuize
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina


Shawn schreef:

Marc Ramsey wrote:
Soarin Again wrote:
At 05:42 23 December 2006, Js wrote:
306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!

Yes, it is.
Anyone trying to beat that record should be certain
their parachute is
in good shape, as the number of wings will likely total
zero.
Jim

Does anyone know if his Nimbus 4DM has had special
modifications to increase the vne at altitude, or does
he just not care about operating limitations?


306 km/hr true airspeed is 200 to 220 km/hr IAS at the 20000+ foot
altitudes used for these wave flights. Some gliders do require a
reduction in Vne at higher altitudes, but it isn't necessarily the case
that the limitation was exceeded.


I find these sorts of discussions amusing. Do F1 drivers religiously
follow redline engine speeds or anticipated braking limits for
conditions when they're out to beat the next guy?
Breaking records in aircraft is not analogous to driving the family SUV
to the mall, or the 1-26 around a silver distance triangle. Speed
limits and safe and reasonable don't apply. If it wasn't pushing the
envelope, we'd all be doing it.
My $ 0.02.


Shawn


When not flying in an airworthiness glider you're simply not allowed to
fly at all, so no records either. That does give Americans (of which
most have an experimental registrated glider) in fact an unfair
advantage, but up to now no one cared. Maybe that's gonna change...

  #3  
Old December 23rd 06, 07:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

Shawn wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote:


306 km/hr true airspeed is 200 to 220 km/hr IAS at the 20000+ foot
altitudes used for these wave flights. Some gliders do require a
reduction in Vne at higher altitudes, but it isn't necessarily the
case that the limitation was exceeded.


I find these sorts of discussions amusing. Do F1 drivers religiously
follow redline engine speeds or anticipated braking limits for
conditions when they're out to beat the next guy?
Breaking records in aircraft is not analogous to driving the family SUV
to the mall, or the 1-26 around a silver distance triangle. Speed
limits and safe and reasonable don't apply. If it wasn't pushing the
envelope, we'd all be doing it.


And that's why I think these discussions are interesting instead of
amusing. What risks are they taking, and how did they determine these
risks? Klaus does not seem a like a crazy man, so I suspect his risk
analysis would be very enlightening. And now we know it's a modified
Nimbus, so perhaps he is not taking any extra risk at all - even more
interesting! I hope we hear more about the modifications and how they
tested their effect.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly
* "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. Roger Aviation Marketplace 1 November 22nd 04 07:34 PM
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. Roger Soaring 1 May 13th 04 01:31 AM
Argentina ! Frank Noort Military Aviation 0 January 27th 04 09:47 PM
Flying in Argentina Jay Soaring 1 November 25th 03 04:52 AM
new records (Out&Return) for Delore-Fossett in Argentina cernauta Soaring 0 November 17th 03 02:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.