![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Linc wrote:
boB, I would never bust on you for it, and anyone who would, "they should hold their manhood cheap." I find it a prudent course of action and like I said, if you have the tools to use, you handicap yourself by not using them. My goal is to always live to fly another day. Speaking of those rules, were they host-nation, USAREUR, or homegrown within the unit? Linc Hi Linc. My unit flew out of Stuttgart International. My company was a tactical unit flying OH58D's within a General Support Battalion. If it would have been an Army Airfield the rules can be changed to suit the training but the German Government wasn't keen to allow something they deemed unsafe so we had to abide by the rules of the host country. It usually wasn't that bad, .... what am I saying, it was Germany, it seemed it was always bad...... My unit was a part of 7th Corp which deployed to Desert Shield/Storm in December 1990. But then again, flying in Germany was a LOT less restrictive than flying in the US. Helicopter flights within Germany were usually flown below 500 feet and when the threat was elevated were were required to fly below 100 feet. You could land where-ever you wanted throughout the countryside as long as you weren't landing beside a farmer on his tractor. It sounds fun, and it was if you were in an area you knew. But flying across new terrain was a constant effort to see and avoid wires. It got stressful at times and you were almost always on the wrong side of the dead man's curve. But the Bell helicopters came through fine and could be depended on for getting you out of bad situations. (except for the AH-1Q's and OH58A's, the underpowered hogs) -- boB copter.six U.S. Army Aviation (retired) Central Texas 5NM West of Gray Army/Killeen Regional (KGRK) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
boB,
Good stuff! We're underpowered again, thanks to all the armament and the boxes to run it, but the engine is extremely reliable. I have never had a serious engine issue (knock on wood) and I attribute it to the maintenance crews who manage the aircraft I get to fly. A little credit goes to Rolls Royce as well, who seem to take the whole engine failure thing very seriously and work hard to keep a reliable product in the system. We still live in and beneath the avoid bubble of the height-velocity curve. Some things never change, I guess. My last questions are, "How would they know the difference, whether you were coming in with the goggles or not?" Or were you flying GM-5s? shudders I flew GM-5s once in AO school. It was a great night to fly goggles but it was like flying on the very worst night with ANVIS. Merry Christmas Linc boB wrote: Linc wrote: boB, I would never bust on you for it, and anyone who would, "they should hold their manhood cheap." I find it a prudent course of action and like I said, if you have the tools to use, you handicap yourself by not using them. My goal is to always live to fly another day. Speaking of those rules, were they host-nation, USAREUR, or homegrown within the unit? Linc Hi Linc. My unit flew out of Stuttgart International. My company was a tactical unit flying OH58D's within a General Support Battalion. If it would have been an Army Airfield the rules can be changed to suit the training but the German Government wasn't keen to allow something they deemed unsafe so we had to abide by the rules of the host country. It usually wasn't that bad, .... what am I saying, it was Germany, it seemed it was always bad...... My unit was a part of 7th Corp which deployed to Desert Shield/Storm in December 1990. But then again, flying in Germany was a LOT less restrictive than flying in the US. Helicopter flights within Germany were usually flown below 500 feet and when the threat was elevated were were required to fly below 100 feet. You could land where-ever you wanted throughout the countryside as long as you weren't landing beside a farmer on his tractor. It sounds fun, and it was if you were in an area you knew. But flying across new terrain was a constant effort to see and avoid wires. It got stressful at times and you were almost always on the wrong side of the dead man's curve. But the Bell helicopters came through fine and could be depended on for getting you out of bad situations. (except for the AH-1Q's and OH58A's, the underpowered hogs) -- boB copter.six U.S. Army Aviation (retired) Central Texas 5NM West of Gray Army/Killeen Regional (KGRK) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Linc" wrote in message ps.com... boB, Good stuff! We're underpowered again, thanks to all the armament and My last questions are, "How would they know the difference, whether you were coming in with the goggles or not?" Or were you flying GM-5s? shudders I flew GM-5s once in AO school. It was a great night to fly goggles but it was like flying on the very worst night with ANVIS. Merry Christmas Linc When I flew we had ANVS 6 NVG's. Pretty nice goggles but a 40 degree FOV and 20-200 vision is bad no matter what. I haven't even seen any newer versions. boB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Linc" wrote in message ps.com... boB, My last questions are, "How would they know the difference, whether you were coming in with the goggles or not?" Or were you flying GM-5s? Sorry, forgot to answer. They have no way of knowing but you can't get too near an International Airport with NVG's before the goggles shut down from the light. It doesn't take much. boB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm spoiled then, (v)1 Types 5 & 6 with new image intensifiers were
incredible. And now the whole thing is better with the (v)3. 25mm eyepiece lenses make it easy to make sure you get that full 40 degrees. We hear rumors that 40 degree goggles are in the making, but nothing coming out yet. With (v)3, I fly in and out of fully lit airfields and over urban terrain with no problems. Our hot refuel has bright lights for the fuelers to see with at night. Some guys have complained about how bright they are for taxiing in. I don't think they know how good they have it. Linc boB wrote: "Linc" wrote in message ps.com... boB, My last questions are, "How would they know the difference, whether you were coming in with the goggles or not?" Or were you flying GM-5s? Sorry, forgot to answer. They have no way of knowing but you can't get too near an International Airport with NVG's before the goggles shut down from the light. It doesn't take much. boB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |