![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:26:46 -0800, Sam Spade wrote
(in article ): Or you could have circled-to-land following the normal VFR pattern for the airport since the weather was VFR. Circle-to-land needs to be modified to conform to local traffic expectations when the weather is good. Why? Most towers expect you to circle at the circling minima. They will tell you if they want you to do something else. OTOH, if you are going to break off the instrument approach in order to accommodate the unfounded expectations of VFR traffic, you should probably cancel IFR considerably before you enter the pattern for either runway, remembering that once you do that you have to follow cloud clearance rules. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:26:46 -0800, Sam Spade wrote (in article ): Or you could have circled-to-land following the normal VFR pattern for the airport since the weather was VFR. Circle-to-land needs to be modified to conform to local traffic expectations when the weather is good. Why? Most towers expect you to circle at the circling minima. They will tell you if they want you to do something else. Why do you think they would expect you to disregard local traffic pattern and perhaps noise abatement procedures when the Class D surface area is VFR? If it is a training flight I would certainly make it clear with them before I descended to the circling MDA (assuming here that it is significantly lower than standard traffic pattern altitude). OTOH, if you are going to break off the instrument approach in order to accommodate the unfounded expectations of VFR traffic, you should probably cancel IFR considerably before you enter the pattern for either runway, remembering that once you do that you have to follow cloud clearance rules. Unfounded expectation? As to your advice to cancel, that is my option to exercise depending upon the circumstances. Perhaps the weather is 1,500 overcast and 4 miles. I would like to preserve my IFR clearance at a one runway airport. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/26/06 05:49, Sam Spade wrote:
C J Campbell wrote: On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:26:46 -0800, Sam Spade wrote (in article ): Or you could have circled-to-land following the normal VFR pattern for the airport since the weather was VFR. Circle-to-land needs to be modified to conform to local traffic expectations when the weather is good. Why? Most towers expect you to circle at the circling minima. They will tell you if they want you to do something else. Why do you think they would expect you to disregard local traffic pattern and perhaps noise abatement procedures when the Class D surface area is VFR? Because you're flying a practice IAP. If it is a training flight I would certainly make it clear with them before I descended to the circling MDA (assuming here that it is significantly lower than standard traffic pattern altitude). That was done by asking to fly the approach, and getting the (practice) clearance from ATC and them handing the flight off to the tower. At least at the towers I've practiced at, they've expected me to fly the circling maneuver, and they've accommodated it as necessary. After all, the circling maneuver is part of what I want to practice. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/26/06 05:49, Sam Spade wrote: C J Campbell wrote: On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:26:46 -0800, Sam Spade wrote (in article ): Or you could have circled-to-land following the normal VFR pattern for the airport since the weather was VFR. Circle-to-land needs to be modified to conform to local traffic expectations when the weather is good. Why? Most towers expect you to circle at the circling minima. They will tell you if they want you to do something else. Why do you think they would expect you to disregard local traffic pattern and perhaps noise abatement procedures when the Class D surface area is VFR? Because you're flying a practice IAP. If it is a training flight I would certainly make it clear with them before I descended to the circling MDA (assuming here that it is significantly lower than standard traffic pattern altitude). That was done by asking to fly the approach, and getting the (practice) clearance from ATC and them handing the flight off to the tower. At least at the towers I've practiced at, they've expected me to fly the circling maneuver, and they've accommodated it as necessary. After all, the circling maneuver is part of what I want to practice. If it is an airport you're familiar with, and you have no doubt they accept it, fine. There are a lot of noise sensitive airprots, at least in my area, where it is presumed you will follow the traffic patterns in use and established noise abatement procedures when the place is VFR. If uncertain, it is follow to descent to 450 feet, HAA without a very clear understanding. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Circle to land question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | May 24th 05 04:22 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
One more question regarding great circle and two intersecting course. | Sims | Piloting | 7 | October 9th 03 07:25 PM |
Defensive circle | Dave Eadsforth | Military Aviation | 23 | October 9th 03 06:13 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |