![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote The Lockheed Electra sure could have used a prop AD for this one! So there was a RPM restriction on the Electra? What do you recall? Didn't a constant speed prop pretty much bypass it? -- Jim in NC I only have a vague recall on this. It came up during a safety meeting at the Naval Test Pilots School many years ago. If I remember right, it involved a harmonic mode (whirl I believe) not transmitting correctly through the outboard engine mounts on the airplane. They specified certain conditions that caused this to happen but I don't remember what they were. I seem to recall that after the issue was addressed by Lockheed and the mounts were redesigned, there was a further wing issue as well that had to be dealt with. I think Macklin will probably be the guy who can best deal with exactly what was going on. Dudley Henriques |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks, but I'm not really an expert on the Electra. But I
also read that they harmonic was such that a whirl-mode began [as you also said] and this caused several complete airframe failures. The NTSB probably has a file. "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... | | "Morgans" wrote in message | ... | | "Dudley Henriques" wrote | | The Lockheed Electra sure could have used a prop AD for this one! | | So there was a RPM restriction on the Electra? | | What do you recall? Didn't a constant speed prop pretty much bypass it? | -- | Jim in NC | | I only have a vague recall on this. It came up during a safety meeting at | the Naval Test Pilots School many years ago. | If I remember right, it involved a harmonic mode (whirl I believe) not | transmitting correctly through the outboard engine mounts on the airplane. | They specified certain conditions that caused this to happen but I don't | remember what they were. I seem to recall that after the issue was addressed | by Lockheed and the mounts were redesigned, there was a further wing issue | as well that had to be dealt with. | I think Macklin will probably be the guy who can best deal with exactly what | was going on. | Dudley Henriques | | |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dudley Henriques" wrote I only have a vague recall on this. It came up during a safety meeting at the Naval Test Pilots School many years ago. If I remember right, it involved a harmonic mode (whirl I believe) not transmitting correctly through the outboard engine mounts on the airplane. They specified certain conditions that caused this to happen but I don't remember what they were. I seem to recall that after the issue was addressed by Lockheed and the mounts were redesigned, there was a further wing issue as well that had to be dealt with. Yeah, I remember that coming up once before, now that the whirl mode is mentioned. I don't recall the details, either. -- Jim in NC |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google found this
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra1.html "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... | | "Morgans" wrote in message | ... | | "Dudley Henriques" wrote | | The Lockheed Electra sure could have used a prop AD for this one! | | So there was a RPM restriction on the Electra? | | What do you recall? Didn't a constant speed prop pretty much bypass it? | -- | Jim in NC | | I only have a vague recall on this. It came up during a safety meeting at | the Naval Test Pilots School many years ago. | If I remember right, it involved a harmonic mode (whirl I believe) not | transmitting correctly through the outboard engine mounts on the airplane. | They specified certain conditions that caused this to happen but I don't | remember what they were. I seem to recall that after the issue was addressed | by Lockheed and the mounts were redesigned, there was a further wing issue | as well that had to be dealt with. | I think Macklin will probably be the guy who can best deal with exactly what | was going on. | Dudley Henriques | | |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google found this
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra1.html And here is part 2. http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra2.html -- Jim in NC |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I saw part two is linked at the bottom of the page, so
didn't bother to put both there. Didn't know the link was bad when I posted. Thanks. What did you think of the article? It seems to be a an aviation history students paper. "Morgans" wrote in message ... | Google found this | http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra1.html | | And here is part 2. | http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra2.html | -- | Jim in NC | | |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... I saw part two is linked at the bottom of the page, so didn't bother to put both there. Didn't know the link was bad when I posted. Thanks. What did you think of the article? It seems to be a an aviation history students paper. Perhaps more like a journalist student who is interested in aviation. I noticed the poetic license, and the big buzz words, like "tube of death." Some technical items not quite right, but if this is a journalist, it is better accident reporting, than most! g -- Jim in NC |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... Google found this http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra1.html The second page of the above story is located at: http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~steve/Spiro/electra2.html (The link embedded at the end of the first page is obsolete) Peter "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... | | "Morgans" wrote in message | ... | | "Dudley Henriques" wrote | | The Lockheed Electra sure could have used a prop AD for this one! | | So there was a RPM restriction on the Electra? | | What do you recall? Didn't a constant speed prop pretty much bypass it? | -- | Jim in NC | | I only have a vague recall on this. It came up during a safety meeting at | the Naval Test Pilots School many years ago. | If I remember right, it involved a harmonic mode (whirl I believe) not | transmitting correctly through the outboard engine mounts on the airplane. | They specified certain conditions that caused this to happen but I don't | remember what they were. I seem to recall that after the issue was addressed | by Lockheed and the mounts were redesigned, there was a further wing issue | as well that had to be dealt with. | I think Macklin will probably be the guy who can best deal with exactly what | was going on. | Dudley Henriques | | |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Assuming a certain amount of artistic license, the reference article is
probably correct. I worked on another project with Prof Robt Scanlan of Princeton Univ who was in charge of that Electra analysis. As I recall he said that when an Electra was newly manufactured, the whirl mode resonant frequency of the engine mount was about 5 Hz & the flutter frequency of the wing was 3 Hz. After a period of service, the engine mounts would crack (not that unusual in large aircraft) and eventually the engine mount frequency would decay to the point that the two frequencies would become so close that the engine motion would couple into the wing flutter. Eventually the dynamic system became divergent resulting in wing structural failure. You must recognize however that the Electra whirl mode problem was and is unrelated to the RPM restrictions with certain engine propeller combinations. These restrictions address torsional resonance modes of the propeller engine crankshaft combination - not whirl modes. I understand the frequencies of concern are in the 220 Hz range (a couple of half-steps below middle C on a piano) which is the sixth harmonic of crankshaft rotation in a 4 cylinder engine. The resonant mode shape is the back of the crank going to-and-fro while the prop tips go fro-and-to assuming a theoretical observer riding on the spinner (read that again carefully!). Changing the stiffness of the crank (i, e, the solid core) changes the natural frequency of the system enough to get it out of the operating harmonics range. Adding a damper mass on the back of the crank is another way to reduce the torsional vibration buildup and the resulting prop and crank stresses. I could hear the 6th harmonic in my 172M at low cruise too even though it was not placarded against it. There was a certain ringing harshness in the noise, and any musical ear could recognize that component in the cabin noise once it is pointed out. As a precaution I stayed away from that RPM. Frankly from my limited experience in vibration, I am surprised that narrow a restriction is sufficient to prevent problems in the fleet. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Verdant green... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 17 | July 9th 06 07:58 AM |
| Military Green Laser Pointer | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 5th 05 07:42 PM |
| Simple Green Pirep | JJS | Owning | 13 | May 19th 05 04:35 AM |
| I am in The Killing Zone | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 68 | June 14th 04 06:16 PM |
| Garmin gpsmap 76s airspace zone home made maps (follow up) | Gilles_Sauvagnat | Soaring | 0 | May 13th 04 09:41 PM |