![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the numbers are real, that Standard Cirrus is now a 41-1+
sailplane-and that IS a serious improvement. $16K for a 41-1sailplane is great, and a boon for a lot of people that do not have $40K-60K for that type of sailplane performance. Looks like some older sailplanes could be hanging out with a new crowd. Mike wrote: John Galloway wrote: Noone picking up on Dick Johnson's last paragraph?? http://sinhatech.com/SinhaFCSD-Progress-12132006.asp John Galloway The results are interesting, but way do the testing on a Std. Cirrus? To be taken seriously put them on a modern ship and test them. I can't believe Dick did the testing on the Std. Cirrus and did not at least put them on his Ventus for some additional comparisons. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
The web link gives my interpretation of Dick's preliminary data. He will speak for himself in Memphis. Many will not agree with my methods. I'll be more specific soon. possibly before Memphis, but using my data from two years of flying deturbulated wings, not Dick's data. I'll give my interpretation of his data after the convention. I'm not an aerodynamicist, so you will be excused for not believing me. On the other hand, new things often don't fit in old boxes, so an open mind may be required for understanding the true potential of this new technology. Jim Hendrix (The Johnson deturbulator flight tests were sponsored by Dallas Glider Association.) On Dec 26, 11:41 am, "Mike" wrote: If the numbers are real, that Standard Cirrus is now a 41-1+ sailplane-and that IS a serious improvement. $16K for a 41-1sailplane is great, and a boon for a lot of people that do not have $40K-60K for that type of sailplane performance. Looks like some older sailplanes could be hanging out with a new crowd. Mike wrote: John Galloway wrote: Noone picking up on Dick Johnson's last paragraph?? http://sinhatech.com/SinhaFCSD-Progress-12132006.asp John Galloway The results are interesting, but way do the testing on a Std. Cirrus? To be taken seriously put them on a modern ship and test them. I can't believe Dick did the testing on the Std. Cirrus and did not at least put them on his Ventus for some additional comparisons.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electric maned airplane | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 26 | July 20th 06 05:43 AM |
Electric maned airplane | Flyingmonk | Home Built | 26 | July 20th 06 05:43 AM |
Becker AR-3201 radio owners: check your batteries | sssarah | Soaring | 3 | May 24th 06 07:40 AM |
Switching Batteries Advice? | ContestID67 | Soaring | 17 | January 12th 06 01:02 AM |
Batteries, charger for Yaesu handheld - NiCad or NiMH? | David Herman | Owning | 10 | November 7th 04 04:30 PM |