A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

2-Batteries



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 26th 06, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 199
Default Deturbulators was 2-Batteries

If the numbers are real, that Standard Cirrus is now a 41-1+
sailplane-and that IS a serious improvement. $16K for a 41-1sailplane
is great, and a boon for a lot of people that do not have $40K-60K for
that type of sailplane performance. Looks like some older sailplanes
could be hanging out with a new crowd.

Mike



wrote:
John Galloway wrote:
Noone picking up on Dick Johnson's last paragraph??

http://sinhatech.com/SinhaFCSD-Progress-12132006.asp

John Galloway


The results are interesting, but way do the testing on a Std. Cirrus?
To be taken seriously put them on a modern ship and test them. I
can't believe Dick did the testing on the Std. Cirrus and did not at
least put them on his Ventus for some additional comparisons.


  #2  
Old December 31st 06, 10:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Deturbulators was 2-Batteries

Mike,

The web link gives my interpretation of Dick's preliminary data. He
will speak for himself in Memphis.

Many will not agree with my methods. I'll be more specific soon.
possibly before Memphis, but using my data from two years of flying
deturbulated wings, not Dick's data. I'll give my interpretation of
his data after the convention. I'm not an aerodynamicist, so you will
be excused for not believing me. On the other hand, new things often
don't fit in old boxes, so an open mind may be required for
understanding the true potential of this new technology.

Jim Hendrix
(The Johnson deturbulator flight tests were sponsored by Dallas Glider
Association.)

On Dec 26, 11:41 am, "Mike" wrote:
If the numbers are real, that Standard Cirrus is now a 41-1+
sailplane-and that IS a serious improvement. $16K for a 41-1sailplane
is great, and a boon for a lot of people that do not have $40K-60K for
that type of sailplane performance. Looks like some older sailplanes
could be hanging out with a new crowd.

Mike



wrote:
John Galloway wrote:
Noone picking up on Dick Johnson's last paragraph??


http://sinhatech.com/SinhaFCSD-Progress-12132006.asp


John Galloway


The results are interesting, but way do the testing on a Std. Cirrus?
To be taken seriously put them on a modern ship and test them. I
can't believe Dick did the testing on the Std. Cirrus and did not at
least put them on his Ventus for some additional comparisons.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric maned airplane Flyingmonk Piloting 26 July 20th 06 05:43 AM
Electric maned airplane Flyingmonk Home Built 26 July 20th 06 05:43 AM
Becker AR-3201 radio owners: check your batteries sssarah Soaring 3 May 24th 06 07:40 AM
Switching Batteries Advice? ContestID67 Soaring 17 January 12th 06 01:02 AM
Batteries, charger for Yaesu handheld - NiCad or NiMH? David Herman Owning 10 November 7th 04 04:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.