![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to think that there's a happy medium here somewhere, but
given the choice between no GA, and lots of GA, I'll take the risk with a pattern that's full, thank you. Even if they make straight in approaches at non-towered airports? ![]() -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose writes:
Even if they make straight in approaches at non-towered airports? There's nothing wrong with a straight-in approach. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: Jose writes: Even if they make straight in approaches at non-towered airports? There's nothing wrong with a straight-in approach. Overhead approach is far better -- it lets you see other traffic in the pattern, and, done right, gets you on the ground fastest. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if they make straight in approaches at non-towered airports?
There's nothing wrong with a straight-in approach. Overhead approach is far better -- it lets you see other traffic in the pattern, and, done right, gets you on the ground fastest. Both approaches are fine, unless the pattern is full. Jose is referring to my vocal disdain for the (usually corporate) pilots who come blasting into a full pattern from all angles, landing on any runway, from any point in the pattern, without regard for procedure or protocol, putting everyone at risk in order to save a few gallons of Jet-A/Avgas. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Dec 2006 14:04:14 -0800, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: Even if they make straight in approaches at non-towered airports? There's nothing wrong with a straight-in approach. Overhead approach is far better -- it lets you see other traffic in the pattern, and, done right, gets you on the ground fastest. Both approaches are fine, unless the pattern is full. Negative Ghostrider the pattern is full. Jose is referring to my vocal disdain for the (usually corporate) pilots who come blasting into a full pattern from all angles, landing on any runway, from any point in the pattern, without regard for procedure or protocol, putting everyone at risk in order to save a few gallons of Jet-A/Avgas. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Negative Ghostrider the pattern is full.
Sorry, Goose...but it's time to buzz the tower.... Great balls of fire! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, iA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual glide slope, $95...priceless! | Jack Allison | Owning | 20 | October 22nd 06 03:45 AM |
Priceless Tugs | kojak | Owning | 0 | August 9th 05 10:25 PM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 34 | March 7th 04 06:27 AM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 15 | February 28th 04 04:17 PM |
Priceless in Afganistan | breyfogle | Military Aviation | 18 | February 24th 04 05:54 AM |