![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Sadly, the reason GA flying is priced so high is because so few people actually want to do it. In part, but there are also other obstacles. It's extremely hard to get a pilot's license as compared to a driver's license, for example (independent of the extremely high cost). Oh, wait -- you *can* buy an airplane for about what a new car costs. Our old Warrior, which faithfully carried my family from coast to coast from '98 to '02, cost less than our hotel's courtesy van. Which is more comfortable across country? And STILL there isn't a plane in every garage. Why? Too expensive, too difficult, too inconvenient. This limits flying to the real enthusiasts. But Mary and I work on converting each and every one of those "pilot wannabees" who step into our lobby. I'll set them in the Kiwi, get 'em shooting an approach into Madeline Island at sunset, and watch the gears start turning... Until clocks, calendars, and wallets lock those gears in place again. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, wait -- you *can* buy an airplane for about what a new car costs.
Our old Warrior, which faithfully carried my family from coast to coast from '98 to '02, cost less than our hotel's courtesy van. Which is more comfortable across country? Actually, if you're talking cross-country, I'll take the Warrior. True, it's not as spacious inside, but it's plenty comfortable, and it'll get you across the country in hours, rather than days. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Actually, if you're talking cross-country, I'll take the Warrior. True, it's not as spacious inside, but it's plenty comfortable, and it'll get you across the country in hours, rather than days. Do you sleep inside the aircraft, or do you land it inside the parking lot of the hotel? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, if you're talking cross-country, I'll take the Warrior.
True, it's not as spacious inside, but it's plenty comfortable, and it'll get you across the country in hours, rather than days. Do you sleep inside the aircraft, or do you land it inside the parking lot of the hotel? Personally, I have never slept in my plane(s). I know guys who do, however, routinely. It's not as uncomfortable as you might think. Interestingly enough (and slightly OT), I can fit MORE stuff in our Pathfinder than I can in our Subaru station wagon with the seats folded down. It doesn't *look* like it should all fit, but it does. We've got plywood sheets (from a previous owner) that have been cut to fit from behind the front seats, all the way to the baggage compartment bulkhead. (You take the back seats out to do this, obviously.) The end result is a mini-van-sized area that would easily fit an air bed, if desired. Anyway, flying cross country will get me to Reno, NV by suppertime, or to the east coast of the United States by mid-afternoon. Or, I can be in Florida in six hours, and to Canada in three. With GA, there is little need for too many intermediate en route hotels! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK Jay, you have tolerated this guy, and have been one of the most open
minded and welcoming of the "regulars" on this NG. Do you still feel the same way, or are you rolling your eyes or gnashing your teeth yet at his imbecilic replies? I find it pretty intolerable to accept responses from a person who admits that they are afraid to fly, yet somehow makes pronouncements like a 5,000 hour pro.(example: "straight in approaches are OK") You're probably right in not responding, but I guess I'm more intolerant of idiots and lunacy. I suppose it's better to feel sorry for him and accept him for what he is, but when he argues with no factual basis, it becomes hard to take. I guess that's newsgroup at it's worst. It sure was nice not seeing his posts for a few days. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're probably right in not responding, but I guess I'm more intolerant of
idiots and lunacy. I suppose it's better to feel sorry for him and accept him for what he is, but when he argues with no factual basis, it becomes hard to take. I do feel sorry for him. He's built a reality that only he can appreciate, and a strange intolerance for something he apparently loves. Why in the world someone would want to emulate flying without ever really *doing* it is simply beyond my comprehension. But the world is full of interesting folks, and anything that confuses me I usually find difficult to ignore. So, I keep swinging for the fence. MX is obviously not stupid, yet his responses are stubbornly illogical at times. In my experience with the public I have found that this trait isn't unusual -- so perhaps I'm just more used to it than you are? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why in the world someone would want to emulate flying without
ever really *doing* it is simply beyond my comprehension. Well, I might prefer to emulate Indy 500 racing than actually doing it. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Why in the world someone would want to emulate flying without ever really *doing* it is simply beyond my comprehension. Perhaps because you assume that flying in reality is unconditionally preferable to flying in simulation. However, just as flying for real has advantages that simulation does not, flying in simulation has advantages that flying for real does not. Thus, it's entirely to be expected that some people would prefer simulation to real flight. I've given examples before, but I can repeat a few. One example is that flying for real actually requires that one go somewhere. For people who don't like to travel or commute, this is a huge drawback to flying for real. Simulation takes you nowhere in real-world terms, and so it's ideal if you don't actually want to go anywhere. Simulation allows you to fly without paying the price of actually moving from place to place, with all the inconveniences that the latter brings. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree, although it is frustrating to see an interesting discourse get
disrupted by argumentative comments and lack of logic or experience. You almost sound like a closet democrat! It must come from living in that liberal town! Best wishes. JN |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: MX is obviously not stupid, yet his responses are stubbornly illogical at times. In my experience with the public I have found that this trait isn't unusual -- so perhaps I'm just more used to it than you are? Or possibly based on his virtual perception of reality. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual glide slope, $95...priceless! | Jack Allison | Owning | 20 | October 22nd 06 03:45 AM |
Priceless Tugs | kojak | Owning | 0 | August 9th 05 10:25 PM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 34 | March 7th 04 06:27 AM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 15 | February 28th 04 04:17 PM |
Priceless in Afganistan | breyfogle | Military Aviation | 18 | February 24th 04 05:54 AM |