![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc writes:
However, on downloading and printing a chart from the Airnav website, I noticed that they were from the last cycle, so might not be valid or current(??) Mxsmanic wrote: You're not supposed to use charts from AirNav for navigation. The Flight Guide says "not for navigation" too, but their airport diagrams, readily obvious illustrations of reporting points, traffic patterns and other details make it a very valuable cockpit resource, as long as you keep it updated, IMO. If we eliminated all the stuff that says "not for navigation", we'd have a lot less useful info at our fingertips. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I suspect the AirNav stuff is identical to the "real" charts, They *are* the real charts. Airnav links to the NACO website for the PDF files. They were just lagged a bit in updating the links to the updated cycle on NACO during the last few days. Whether a chart is current or not has *nothing* to do with the dates printed on the edge of NACO chart. Each chart has a serial number printed at the lower left hand. (http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0613/00142IL16R.PDF for example, has "Amdt20 06103"). It means the chart is last revisioned on the 130th day of 2006. As long as the most recent chart on NACO has the same serial number you chart is still current. It doesn't matter if you printed it out 3 years ago. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed. I always use the FAA site. Some of the other sites aren't current,
especial near the end of the cycle. On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:37:57 -0600, "Stan Prevost" wrote: I don't see how it could be much easier than the FAA site http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/d_tpp . "Viperdoc" wrote in message .. . I was planning a trip, and in addition to the standard Jepp charts, eFlyBook (another saga), I also print out a few of the FAA charts (larger, easier to read at night, can scribble on them, etc). However, on downloading and printing a chart from the Airnav website, I noticed that they were from the last cycle, so might not be valid or current(??) Has anyone else noticed this? Are the FAA or AOPA sites any easier to access and print? GeorgeC |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jose" wrote in message
t Are there any sites that have current VFR sectionals and/or low enroute charts to print? skyvector.com does. http://skyvector.com/#16-15-3-2886-2532 is the Danbury area. While I like SkyVector, pay attention to the print in the top right corner: quote Don't go flying with this website! Purchase a real chart, and come back alive to visit us again. /quote I don't know of any official sources for chart downloads. Even if there were, printing them would be a beast of a task - especially for any significant XC. -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://openspf.org ____________________ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John T writes:
I don't know of any official sources for chart downloads. Even if there were, printing them would be a beast of a task - especially for any significant XC. You could read them on a laptop, which would have the added advantage of illumination at night. However, I think all the sectionals are prepared by hand, and they depend on physical techniques such as overprinting, so you probably won't see PDFs any time soon. Still, it would be nice to be able to download scans, or anything. And I don't see why they wouldn't be free, since they are government produced and carry no copyright. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:09:33 +0100
Mxsmanic wrote: John T writes: I don't know of any official sources for chart downloads. Even if there were, printing them would be a beast of a task - especially for any significant XC. You could read them on a laptop, which would have the added advantage of illumination at night. However, I think all the sectionals are prepared by hand, and they depend on physical techniques such as overprinting, so you probably won't see PDFs any time soon. Still, it would be nice to be able to download scans, or anything. And I don't see why they wouldn't be free, since they are government produced and carry no copyright. His subscription ran out so they are now out of date, but Kyler hosts FAA supplied TIFF sectionals at http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/FAA/sectionals/ . Being an electronic format, you can convert them to whatever you want. Imagemagick worked very well for me to convert them to compressed JPG or PNG files and store the whole USA on a 1GB memory card to view on a handheld. It was lot more compact than carrying and unfolding a bunch of paper charts. Doug -- For UNIX, Linux and security articles visit http://SecurityBulletins.com/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Spencer writes:
Being an electronic format, you can convert them to whatever you want. Imagemagick worked very well for me to convert them to compressed JPG or PNG files and store the whole USA on a 1GB memory card to view on a handheld. It was lot more compact than carrying and unfolding a bunch of paper charts. You can't convert from scans to PDF, though. PDF is a lot cleaner. Airport diagrams and plates are now in PDF format, but the charts are not. I can see a number of technical problems with converting them, beyond the labor required to rebuild them from scratch. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: You can't convert from scans to PDF, though. PDF is a lot cleaner. This statement is an outright lie. Start Acrobat, click on "file", "import", and "scan". When done scanning, Acrobat will convert the scan into a PDF. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: I don't know of a source for online IFR charts, but if there is one, I'd like to hear about it. Then you have't looked hard enough. http://www.myairplane.com. Consider yourself pwned in this thread. Twice. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFmWrbyBkZmuMZ8L8RAq7MAJ9NR2QpTKyNoRbfYna3le jBcI8T9QCfREo7 ppJlMZchYgaw0uOTO2uNCVM= =Wm55 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43? | Ron A. | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | March 15th 06 02:30 PM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |