A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GNS 430W vs GNS 480



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 1st 07, 10:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480

There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.

Also,
The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The
480 is.

Go with the 480.

  #2  
Old January 1st 07, 11:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480

JD wrote:

There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.

Also,
The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The
480 is.

Go with the 480.


That will change with an update very soon.

The 480 is a dead product.
  #3  
Old January 1st 07, 11:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480



On Jan 1, 5:10 pm, Sam Spade wrote:
JD wrote:
There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.


Also,
The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The
480 is.


Go with the 480.That will change with an update very soon.


The 480 is a dead product.


All products eventually become "dead", I'd bet that the 430 dies before
the 480. The 480 is a much newer design than the 430/530 and should
have a longer life than the older technologies.

But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to
acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on.

It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the
millions(?) they spent to acquire it.

  #4  
Old January 2nd 07, 02:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480

JD wrote:

.

But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to
acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on.

It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the
millions(?) they spent to acquire it.

It was done to kill the competition.
  #5  
Old January 2nd 07, 01:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480

Sam Spade wrote:
JD wrote:

.

But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to
acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on.

It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the
millions(?) they spent to acquire it.

It was done to kill the competition.


Actually, I think it was to get a WAAS product two years before
the 430 was ready and to pick up all the work that UPSAT had done
with ADS-B and to pick up the SL-30/40 non-gps com units that they
didn't have an answer for.

They've already rolled forward the MX-20 into the GMX200 for those
who aren't going to replace the enitre panel for the 600/900x/1000
line.
  #6  
Old January 2nd 07, 02:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480

Ron Natalie wrote:

Sam Spade wrote:

JD wrote:

.

But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to
acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on.

It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the
millions(?) they spent to acquire it.

It was done to kill the competition.



Actually, I think it was to get a WAAS product two years before
the 430 was ready and to pick up all the work that UPSAT had done
with ADS-B and to pick up the SL-30/40 non-gps com units that they
didn't have an answer for.

They've already rolled forward the MX-20 into the GMX200 for those
who aren't going to replace the enitre panel for the 600/900x/1000
line.


That too. ;-)
  #7  
Old January 1st 07, 11:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480

In article .com,
"JD" wrote:

There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.


Do you know what changes the 3.0 software will have?


The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The
480 is.


Is that true even with the WAAS upgrade? I thought the thing that made the
480 primary en-route-capable was the WAAS?
  #8  
Old January 1st 07, 11:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480



On Jan 1, 5:16 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
In article .com,

"JD" wrote:
There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.Do you know what changes the 3.0 software will have?


The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The
480 is.Is that true even with the WAAS upgrade? I thought the thing that made the

480 primary en-route-capable was the WAAS?


The 480 has always been certified for Primary Enroute Navigate, it's
the 530/430 that is not, even with the WAAS upgrades for the 530/430.
But as Sam points out, they will be with a new release of the 530/430
firmware.

  #9  
Old January 1st 07, 11:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roy N5804F
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480


JD


Why is a new version of the software is required and what changes it will
introduce ?
When did Garmin announced that they will "continue development and support
for the 480" ?
What do all the aircraft fitted with only dual 430/530's use for primary
enroute navigation under instrument rules ?

Roy

"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...
There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.

Also,
The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The
480 is.

Go with the 480.





  #10  
Old January 1st 07, 11:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480



On Jan 1, 5:17 pm, "Roy N5804F"
wrote:

Why is a new version of the software is required and what changes it will
introduce ?


I don't know what v3.0 firmware for the 480 will bring. The current 480
firmware is 2.1, so 3.0 should have some significate enhancements. I
just got this from the support guys when I was upgrading to 2.1

When did Garmin announced that they will "continue development and support
for the 480" ?
What do all the aircraft fitted with only dual 430/530's use for primary
enroute navigation under instrument rules ?


What ever they have been using. Could be VOR for example.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.