![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin
AT is and will continue development and support for the 480. Also, The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The 480 is. Go with the 480. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JD wrote:
There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin AT is and will continue development and support for the 480. Also, The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The 480 is. Go with the 480. That will change with an update very soon. The 480 is a dead product. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 1, 5:10 pm, Sam Spade wrote: JD wrote: There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin AT is and will continue development and support for the 480. Also, The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The 480 is. Go with the 480.That will change with an update very soon. The 480 is a dead product. All products eventually become "dead", I'd bet that the 430 dies before the 480. The 480 is a much newer design than the 430/530 and should have a longer life than the older technologies. But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on. It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the millions(?) they spent to acquire it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JD wrote:
. But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on. It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the millions(?) they spent to acquire it. It was done to kill the competition. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Spade wrote:
JD wrote: . But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on. It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the millions(?) they spent to acquire it. It was done to kill the competition. Actually, I think it was to get a WAAS product two years before the 430 was ready and to pick up all the work that UPSAT had done with ADS-B and to pick up the SL-30/40 non-gps com units that they didn't have an answer for. They've already rolled forward the MX-20 into the GMX200 for those who aren't going to replace the enitre panel for the 600/900x/1000 line. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: JD wrote: . But, only Garmin knows for sure, but they spent a lot of money to acquire Apollo and the techonology/engineers that the 480 was built on. It wouldn't make much buisness sense to now kill that product after the millions(?) they spent to acquire it. It was done to kill the competition. Actually, I think it was to get a WAAS product two years before the 430 was ready and to pick up all the work that UPSAT had done with ADS-B and to pick up the SL-30/40 non-gps com units that they didn't have an answer for. They've already rolled forward the MX-20 into the GMX200 for those who aren't going to replace the enitre panel for the 600/900x/1000 line. That too. ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"JD" wrote: There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin AT is and will continue development and support for the 480. Do you know what changes the 3.0 software will have? The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The 480 is. Is that true even with the WAAS upgrade? I thought the thing that made the 480 primary en-route-capable was the WAAS? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 1, 5:16 pm, Roy Smith wrote: In article .com, "JD" wrote: There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin AT is and will continue development and support for the 480.Do you know what changes the 3.0 software will have? The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The 480 is.Is that true even with the WAAS upgrade? I thought the thing that made the 480 primary en-route-capable was the WAAS? The 480 has always been certified for Primary Enroute Navigate, it's the 530/430 that is not, even with the WAAS upgrades for the 530/430. But as Sam points out, they will be with a new release of the 530/430 firmware. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JD Why is a new version of the software is required and what changes it will introduce ? When did Garmin announced that they will "continue development and support for the 480" ? What do all the aircraft fitted with only dual 430/530's use for primary enroute navigation under instrument rules ? Roy "JD" wrote in message oups.com... There is a Version 3.0 of the firmware in progress for the 480, Garmin AT is and will continue development and support for the 480. Also, The 430/530 ARE NOT FAA certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE navigation. The 480 is. Go with the 480. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 1, 5:17 pm, "Roy N5804F" wrote: Why is a new version of the software is required and what changes it will introduce ? I don't know what v3.0 firmware for the 480 will bring. The current 480 firmware is 2.1, so 3.0 should have some significate enhancements. I just got this from the support guys when I was upgrading to 2.1 When did Garmin announced that they will "continue development and support for the 480" ? What do all the aircraft fitted with only dual 430/530's use for primary enroute navigation under instrument rules ? What ever they have been using. Could be VOR for example. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|