![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All it does is relieve the pressure. If there were no trim at all the elevator would be in the exact same position, it would just suck to have to hold it there.
Well, not exactly, not on all aircraft. Consider a trim system which uses a trim tab. The tab projects (say) up, causing the elevator to trail down as its neutral position, pushing the tail up and thus the nose down. Once equilbrium has been reached (no pressure), clamp the elevator in that position, and trim in such a manner that the tab no longer projects up. Now, the elevator is (slightly) more effective at pushing the tail up, because the trim tab is no longer in the airflow in the opposite direction. The nose will be pushed (slightly) further down, and the clamp will be resisting pressure. If you release the clamp, going to a new "no pressure" condition, the elevator =will= move. Looked at another way, if you come from an untrimmed position (with this same aircraft), and position the yoke wherever it needs to be in order to maintain the condition you want (say, straight and level, FSOA), and then clamp the yoke in that position, you will be at the chosen condition. But if you trim, the movement of the trim tab =will= have a (slight) aerodynamic effect. When you actually achieve "no pressure", you will be (slightly) out of trim for the effect you want. 1: I understand the effect is slight, perhaps even not noticable, but I'll bet it can be measured. 2: I understand that when a real pilot actually trims for "no pressure", there is a feedback loop where "no change in flight condition" also feeds into it, so the above discussion is academic. 3: I understand that this will not be true, or will not be true for the same reasons, for other trim systems. However, the quoted statement above is not true, and if Mx made that statement, he would have been jumped on, just because it's Mx making that statement. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps writes:
All it does is relieve the pressure. If there were no trim at all the elevator would be in the exact same position, it would just suck to have to hold it there. That's just it: If there were no trim at all, the elevator wouldn't be there. It would be in its neutral position. Of course you can _push_ it there, but with trim set, it goes there and stays there without being pushed (by you). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
It would be in its neutral position. Jeeze, you really don't want to understand, do you? There is no "neutral position". The position that keeps the plane flying at a certain speed is depending on load, cg and a lot of other factors. It varies with all those - and with the speed you want to fly. The position desired by the pilot can be held by the pilot - OR he can use trim to have the elevator stay in the desired position, to relieve himself of the control force otherwise required. If you fly a cruise speed of 150 knots in a Baron, you'd still have different elevator positions depending on CG location. In fact, the position would change during the flight with fuel burn. Which would be "neutral"? "Neutral" doesn't make any sense. Where the elevator actually is in a desired attitude, is completely irrelevant with regard to control of the airplane - once you've adhered to the limits of all contributing factors with regard to certification. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert writes:
If you fly a cruise speed of 150 knots in a Baron, you'd still have different elevator positions depending on CG location. In fact, the position would change during the flight with fuel burn. Which would be "neutral"? The one that aligns the trim tabs with the control surfaces. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan writes:
What if it's a spring type system, rather than a trim tab - what is the neutral position for that? The same. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Newps writes: All it does is relieve the pressure. If there were no trim at all the elevator would be in the exact same position, it would just suck to have to hold it there. That's just it: If there were no trim at all, the elevator wouldn't be there. It would be in its neutral position. Of course you can _push_ it there, but with trim set, it goes there and stays there without being pushed (by you). In this case, you really need to listen to what Thomas and others are saying. There is no neutral position. There is just a natural position for a certain flight regime. Therefore, if you are hand-flying, and you move the trim, the airplane will react. The pilot will notice this (it's impossible not to). I'm trying to think of a relevant example using a car or roller coaster or other easy to understand situation, but I don't have enough coffee in me yet :-) Perhaps someone else can some up with something. Kev |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kev writes:
In this case, you really need to listen to what Thomas and others are saying. There is no neutral position. There is just a natural position for a certain flight regime. The neutral position for trim tabs is the position in which the trim tabs are aligned with the control surface. The neutral position for control surfaces is the position in which they are aligned with the surfaces to which they are attached (wings or stabilizers). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Kev writes: In this case, you really need to listen to what Thomas and others are saying. There is no neutral position. There is just a natural position for a certain flight regime. The neutral position for trim tabs is the position in which the trim tabs are aligned with the control surface. The neutral position for control surfaces is the position in which they are aligned with the surfaces to which they are attached (wings or stabilizers). Ok Anthony, you have perfectly loaded your aircraft so the that it trims out to what you like to call nuetra or default. What are you going to do once you have burned off fuel and the CG changes? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
What are you going to do once you have burned off fuel and the CG changes? Adjust the trim. Ideally, I'd be in an aircraft where the fuel load is already at that ideal neutral point, and so very little adjustment would be required. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences between automotive & airplane engines | Chris Wells | Home Built | 105 | February 18th 06 11:00 PM |
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet | Navzilla Support | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 05 11:47 PM |
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | September 22nd 05 02:38 AM |
172S Weight and Balance Question | David J | Piloting | 9 | March 23rd 04 01:08 AM |
Weight and balance.. | Bart | Rotorcraft | 9 | August 19th 03 02:57 AM |