![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stan Prevost wrote: From the instrument PTS III(C) "Holding Procedures" "8.Uses proper wind correction procedures to maintain the desired pattern and to arrive over the fix as close as possible to a specified time." On your checkride you need to time your hold to arrive over the fix w/i about 1 minute of the specified time. That relates to timed approaches from a holding fix, which is the only time a crossing time will be specified. No specific tolerances on the time are given anywhere that I know of. I wouldn't disagree with your "about one minute", although nobody I know uses tolerances that large in training. DPEs around here don't seem to specify a time. From the PTS for ATP V Instrument B: Holding 9 ) Arrives over the holding fix as close as possible to the "expect further clearance" time. -Robert, CFII |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... From the PTS for ATP V Instrument B: Holding 9 ) Arrives over the holding fix as close as possible to the "expect further clearance" time. Thanks for that reference, Robert. I have not read the ATP PTS but have never seen any other reference to using EFC in a hold. I still have no idea why it would be so, other than just as a checkride device. It contradicts the standard FAA references that I quoted. Stan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stan Prevost wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... From the PTS for ATP V Instrument B: Holding 9 ) Arrives over the holding fix as close as possible to the "expect further clearance" time. Thanks for that reference, Robert. I have not read the ATP PTS but have never seen any other reference to using EFC in a hold. I still have no idea why it would be so, other than just as a checkride device. It contradicts the standard FAA references that I quoted. Yes, your right that it contradicts the Instrument Flying Handbook. Not sure if there is a revision in the works for either or if the FAA is happy for them to disagree. ![]() for both checkrides. IR or ATP, we pretty much teach the same instrument stuff since a lot of the IR students plan on taking the ATP checkride when able. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much is autopilot on commercial flights today? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 25 | September 12th 06 06:41 AM |
KAP140 autopilot and a KLN94 GPS question | STICKMONKE | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 12th 05 04:06 AM |
mitchell autopilot | dave | Owning | 1 | May 5th 04 06:11 PM |
Chelton AP-3C autopilot | Kyler Laird | Owning | 0 | April 2nd 04 03:08 PM |
KAP140 Autopilot Details | News | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | October 22nd 03 02:01 AM |