![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Cunniff wrote:
No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:51:03 -0800, Sam Spade
wrote: Jack Cunniff wrote: No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? Sounds like the voice of experience to me:-)) Been there and done that. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:51:03 -0800, Sam Spade wrote: Jack Cunniff wrote: No, it takes hundreds of hours flying an actual plane to get to be an IFR pilot. Having simulator experience helps a person understand the environment, but it's not the same as having actually had a scary learning experience in real life. Guaranteed that THOSE are the lessons you learn from. -Jack Where did you get that idea? Sounds like the voice of experience to me:-)) Been there and done that. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain an instrument rating? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain
an instrument rating? at least 250 hours Federal Air Regulation 61.129 a (single engine) and b (multi engine) http://tinyurl.com/yk44ov or, in its long form http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text.... 1.1.2.6.1.2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Mulroy wrote:
What is the regulation that requires "hundreds of hours flying" to obtain an instrument rating? at least 250 hours Federal Air Regulation 61.129 a (single engine) and b (multi engine) http://tinyurl.com/yk44ov or, in its long form http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text.... 1.1.2.6.1.2 That is the section for a commercial certificate. The instrument rating requirements are in 61.65. So where is the requirement for "hundreds of flying hours" to obtain an instrument rating? Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is the section for a commercial certificate. The instrument rating
requirements are in 61.65. So where is the requirement for "hundreds of flying hours" to obtain an instrument rating? And if you check the cancel group you will see that I cancelled the message. You managed to see it before tht cancel took. There used to be a 250 hr (I think it was 250 but maybe 200) requirement for an instrument rating. In later years the FAA has gotten more enlightened and removed the hour requirement. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Ed Mulroy" wrote: There used to be a 250 hr (I think it was 250 but maybe 200) requirement for an instrument rating. Yeah, it used to be 200 hours (circa 1990). -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There used to be a 250 hr (I think it was 250 but maybe 200) requirement for
an instrument rating. In later years the FAA has gotten more enlightened and removed the hour requirement. In 1984, to apply for an instrument rating you needed to have 200 hours of pilot time, of which 100 was PIC, of which 50 was PIC XC time. I do see the wisdom of requiring 200 hours of VFR time before getting the instrument rating, and do not think it was a good idea to drop it. The reason is that it is important to learn how to keep one's eyes outside the cockpit before beginning intensive training in keeping them inside the cockpit, especially as nowadays there are more geegaws inside the cockpit vying for the pilot's attention. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Mulroy wrote:
That is the section for a commercial certificate. The instrument rating requirements are in 61.65. So where is the requirement for "hundreds of flying hours" to obtain an instrument rating? And if you check the cancel group you will see that I cancelled the message. You managed to see it before tht cancel took. There used to be a 250 hr (I think it was 250 but maybe 200) requirement for an instrument rating. In later years the FAA has gotten more enlightened and removed the hour requirement. It used to be 200 hours or a commercial certificate. I believe it was reduced to a 150 hours if the training was done at an approved school. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correction:
The requirement for an Instrument Rating used to be 125 hours, not 250 http://www.aopa.org/learntofly/getback.html#70s scroll down to 61.65 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Propeller thrust question | xerj | Piloting | 11 | November 25th 05 03:12 AM |
Crosswind Landings... But airspeed? | Jmarc99 | Soaring | 21 | October 4th 05 07:54 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
speed record set by scramjet - fair? | Don French | Piloting | 55 | November 28th 04 01:57 PM |
Overweight takeoff / flight | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 50 | December 3rd 03 11:53 PM |