A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multiengine Rating



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 14th 07, 07:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Multiengine Rating


wrote in message oups.com...
: Hi,
:
: i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land), VFR-add-on to my
: PP-ASEL.
: Any comments about the best training aircraft for these purpose ?
: (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond DA42, ..)
:
: There are big differences concerning the rating requirements.
: Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours, other 25 hours
: for the rating.
:
: Why it is so ?
:
: Mike
:

Did mine in a C-310...


  #2  
Old January 14th 07, 09:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Multiengine Rating

Did mine in a Aztec.

BTW, if you plan on getting a commercial, do that before or
as part of the MEL, else you'll have to take the MEL again
to get it on you CPL.



"Blueskies" wrote in message
. net...
|
| wrote in message
oups.com...
| : Hi,
| :
| : i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land),
VFR-add-on to my
| : PP-ASEL.
| : Any comments about the best training aircraft for these
purpose ?
| : (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond
DA42, ..)
| :
| : There are big differences concerning the rating
requirements.
| : Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours,
other 25 hours
| : for the rating.
| :
| : Why it is so ?
| :
| : Mike
| :
|
| Did mine in a C-310...
|
|


  #3  
Old January 17th 07, 12:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Multiengine Rating


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message ...
: Did mine in a Aztec.
:
: BTW, if you plan on getting a commercial, do that before or
: as part of the MEL, else you'll have to take the MEL again
: to get it on you CPL.
:
:
:

Yup, did my commercial high performance ride in the 310...


  #4  
Old January 14th 07, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 315
Default Multiengine Rating

Both the 310 and the Aztec are "real airplanes" in the highly subjective
Gardner lexicon.

Bob

"Blueskies" wrote in message
. net...

wrote in message
oups.com...
: Hi,
:
: i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land), VFR-add-on to my
: PP-ASEL.
: Any comments about the best training aircraft for these purpose ?
: (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond DA42, ..)
:
: There are big differences concerning the rating requirements.
: Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours, other 25 hours
: for the rating.
:
: Why it is so ?
:
: Mike
:

Did mine in a C-310...




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day? Jim Macklin Piloting 39 December 20th 06 12:11 PM
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW Charlie Wolf Naval Aviation 5 May 12th 05 10:34 PM
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) Alan Pendley Instrument Flight Rules 24 December 16th 04 02:16 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Enlisted pilots John Randolph Naval Aviation 41 July 21st 03 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.