![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am very partial to the BE-76 Duchess. It has a redundant
electrical system and very good handling. The Seminole uses the wing from a Cherokee with a 50 gallon fuel tank in an over-sized engine nacelle. The drag between the nacelle and fuselage reduces performance. The Beech has a big elevator and rudder, giving it better control. Beech actually did a full spin test series in the Duchess but decided for marketing reason, not to certify it for intentional spinning. It will recover from a spin on one engine, not many twins can say that. Can't speak for the DA-42, it looks interesting. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P wrote in message oups.com... | Hi, | | i'm interested in the multiengine rating (land), VFR-add-on to my | PP-ASEL. | Any comments about the best training aircraft for these purpose ? | (PA34 Seneca, Beech Duchess, PA44 Seminole, Diamond DA42, ...) | | There are big differences concerning the rating requirements. | Some flight schools offer a multi training of 6 hours, other 25 hours | for the rating. | | Why it is so ? | | Mike | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
I am very partial to the BE-76 Duchess. It has a redundant electrical system and very good handling. The Seminole uses the wing from a Cherokee with a 50 gallon fuel tank in an over-sized engine nacelle. The drag between the nacelle and fuselage reduces performance. The Beech has a big elevator and rudder, giving it better control. Beech actually did a full spin test series in the Duchess but decided for marketing reason, not to certify it for intentional spinning. It will recover from a spin on one engine, not many twins can say that. I would concur, the Duchess is better than a Seminole. Actually, it might even be better than a seneca (some models). But anyway, You should probably have an instrument rating too before you start thinking about a multi-engine rating. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... :I am very partial to the BE-76 Duchess. It has a redundant : electrical system and very good handling. The Seminole uses : the wing from a Cherokee with a 50 gallon fuel tank in an : over-sized engine nacelle. The drag between the nacelle and : fuselage reduces performance. : The Beech has a big elevator and rudder, giving it better : control. Beech actually did a full spin test series in the : Duchess but decided for marketing reason, not to certify it : for intentional spinning. It will recover from a spin on : one engine, not many twins can say that. : : Can't speak for the DA-42, it looks interesting. : : : -- : James H. Macklin : ATP,CFI,A&P : : Was talking to the folks at Diamond during OSH. They were held high during some IFR arrival while flying one of the DA-42s. They just chopped power, dropped gear, and pushed the nose over to dump off the altitude. Apparently no issues with shock cooling those diesels... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day? | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 39 | December 20th 06 12:11 PM |
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW | Charlie Wolf | Naval Aviation | 5 | May 12th 05 10:34 PM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |