A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multiengine Rating



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 07, 06:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mortimer Schnerd, RN[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 597
Default Multiengine Rating

BT wrote:
If you can rent a Twin without the Instrument rating. Then work on your
commercial written and maneuvers in a Piper Arrow or similar aircraft, at
the same time intersperse some Twin Training.

Take the Commercial SEL check ride one month, and the Commercial MEL within
a few days.
Without an Instrument Rating, your Commercial credentials will be limited.



Nobody was interested in renting a twin at all in my area, so I put the multi
rating on the back burner until I had a need. I'd gotten my private,
instrument, and then commercial license and just started building hours by hook
or by crook. I eventually was in the right place at the right time and talked
my way into single engine part 135. I started doing single pilot charters for
them and saw the handwriting on the wall.... it was time to see about a multi
rating (my company used a C-402B for multi charter; a Cherokee Six or C-210 for
single engine charter).

I went down to Atlanta to one of the flight schools that advertised at the time
in Trade-A-Plane. I'm too lazy to go downstairs and see how many hours it took
but it wasn't all that much (maybe 6 or so). We did most of the training in a
multi sim, then went for a couple of flights in a Seminole. After that it was
just a check ride with a designated examiner who was on staff at the flight
school.

I continued doing my single engine charter for the company until one day I was
scheduled to fly as copilot on a C-402 trip and the pilot didn't show up (went
on a bender instead). Didn't call, nothing. Just didn't show up... but I did.
I ended up flying the folks in a Cherokee Six. The following week, I got
checked out as PIC in the C-402. Nice airplane. I enjoyed flying it a lot.

The point of all this is that getting a multi rating as the first add-on to a
private license is probably going to be a waste of time and money. You'll get
infinitely more utility out of an instrument rating. Then when things fall into
place, you can always add the multi rating later. It just isn't that big a
deal.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com


  #2  
Old January 15th 07, 08:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Multiengine Rating

Mortimer Schnerd, RN writes:

We did most of the training in a multi sim, then went for a couple
of flights in a Seminole.


Why waste time in a sim? It has nothing to do with real flying. I
know this because experts here have told me so.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #3  
Old January 15th 07, 12:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 312
Default Multiengine Rating


Oh man, this is such a nice pitch, right down the middle, so very easy
to hit out of the park.

Or is it bait?

Looks like bait.

Smells like bait.

Trolls like bait.



On Jan 15, 3:39 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Mortimer Schnerd, RN writes:
We did most of the training in a multi sim, then went for a couple
of flights in a Seminole.Why waste time in a sim? It has nothing to do with real flying. I

know this because experts here have told me so.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.


  #4  
Old January 15th 07, 03:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kingfish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default Multiengine Rating


Mxsmanic wrote:

Why waste time in a sim? It has nothing to do with real flying. I
know this because experts here have told me so.


Then you haven't been paying attention, my flightless friend : )

(you were right, Tony...)

  #5  
Old January 15th 07, 05:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default Multiengine Rating

yah.. that's a trolls response.. but for those out there that already know
how to fly..
a SIM when USED PROPERLY with a QUALIFIED INSTRUCTOR and replicates the
aircraft to be flown
can be used to practice Check List Items, Systems Knowledge and Procedures

My First "SIM" was a card board mock up of the Navigator crew station on the
B-52, so We could practice checklists and know where all the 100 switches
and dials were. The next "Sim" was a "radar" trainer with a large glass
board that would replicated a radar scope and feed images to the radar (we
are talking 1970s technology), the T10 Trainer.

Oh, I should not forget the "cardboard box" solar system SIM for learning
how to use a sextant and take "Cel Shots"

My Last SIM, was the full motion B-1 Weapons System Trainer.
BT

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Mortimer Schnerd, RN writes:

We did most of the training in a multi sim, then went for a couple
of flights in a Seminole.


Why waste time in a sim? It has nothing to do with real flying. I
know this because experts here have told me so.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day? Jim Macklin Piloting 39 December 20th 06 12:11 PM
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW Charlie Wolf Naval Aviation 5 May 12th 05 10:34 PM
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) Alan Pendley Instrument Flight Rules 24 December 16th 04 02:16 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Enlisted pilots John Randolph Naval Aviation 41 July 21st 03 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.